Jack Lynch Tunnel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jack Lynch Tunnel
Official Name:	Jack Lynch Tunnel
Crosses:	River Lee
Locale:	Cork, Ireland. Links the N8 Cork-Dublin road & N25 Cork-Waterford road into Cork City
Contractor’s Consultant:	Hyder Consulting Ltd. ^[1]
Tunnel Length:	610m immersed tube tunnel section
Total Length of Roadway:	1.8km
External Width:	24.5m
External Height:	8.5m
AADT:	40,000
Beginning date of construction:	1995
Completion Date:	1999
Tolled:	untolled

The Jack Lynch Tunnel (named after the former Taoiseach Jack Lynch), or Tollán Seán Ó Loinsigh in Irish, is an immersed tube tunnel and an integral part of the N25 southern ring road of Cork in Ireland.

It takes the road under the River Lee. North of the tunnel, the ring-road joins the N8 road to Dublin (north), and the city centre (west), with the N25 continuing east to Waterford. The tunnel was completed in May 1999, and carries nearly 40,000 vehicles per day as of 2005, this figure is increasing every year and may rise further with the N25 ring-road being upgraded, notably with the recent opening of the Kinsale road roundabout flyover and planned flyovers on the Sarsfield Road and Bandon Road Roundabouts.

The tunnel has two cells, each with two traffic lanes and two footpaths, and a central bore for use in an emergency only. Pedestrians and cyclists are expressly forbidden from using the tunnel. The exclusion of cyclists has been somewhat controversial as the feeder road is a dual-carriageway and so is open to cyclists, but the bye-law is applied because of space limitations and the obvious danger of cyclists in an enclosed tunnel.

1 History
2 Financing and Contracting
3 Construction
4 Construction Techniques
5 Excavation and Dredging
6 Constructing the Immersed Tube
7 Tunnel Operation
8 References
9 See also

[edit] History

The idea of a crossing of the River Lee downstream of the city came from civil engineers employed by Cork Local Authorities and the central government’s Department of the Environment in the late 1970s. Cork’s suburbs were expanding and traffic was rising as car ownership increased, but the city centre’s street plan, laid out in the late middle ages, was ill equipped to cope. The engineers reasoned that the congestion in the city centre and its radial routes was quickly reaching intolerable levels. They pushed through Cork’s “LUTS” - Land Use and Transportation Study – plan,^[2] to lay down a twenty five year plan for the orderly growth of transport and land use in the greater Cork area. The transportation proposals combined construction of elements of a ring road, a downstream crossing, and computerized management of traffic on existing roads. This group of engineers became the Technical Steering Committee for the LUTS Plan and at that time consisted of Sean McCarthy, the former City Engineer, W.A. "Liam" Fitzgerald, his successor as City Engineer, Liam Mullins, Cork’s County Engineer, John O’Regan, his deputy, B.J. O’Sullivan, the Cork Harbour Engineer, and Sean Walsh and Declan O’Driscoll, the two Assistant Chief Engineering Advisers at the Department of the Environment responsible for the region.^[3] The location and type of crossing was not established by the LUTS plan.

No road development in Ireland prior to that date had required such a large investment,^[4] and therefore the plan met with some opposition on the grounds of cost. In 1980, Cork Corporation commissioned DeLeuw Chadwick O’hEocha, engineering consultants, to undertake a feasibility study of options for a major highway crossing of the River Lee downstream from Cork city centre. A team led by J.D. Shinkwin, Director of DeLeuw Chadwick O’hEocha, performed the study.^[3] The first stage of the report established that the crossing should be located in Dunkettle, rather than at Tivoli, closer to the city centre. The second stage endorsed an immersed tube tunnel as the preferred scheme versus a bridge (either fixed or opening span). The primary reasons were that a tunnel would have a lower construction cost relative to its utility, shorter approach gradients, lower environmental impact and no effect on shipping once built.^[5] While the construction costs for a two lane tunnel were marginally higher than for a two lane high-level bridge, the steep upward ramp for a high-level bridge would slow down cars and trucks as they climbed the bridge, thus reducing its peak capacity dramatically versus a tunnel^[3] or, alternatively, necessitating the addition of a climbing lane with significant additional costs. The other alternative considered by the Steering Committee was an opening span bridge. While this solution would avoid the ramp problem of a high-level bridge, traffic would halt whenever the bridge had to open. Shipping volumes into Cork's port area was rising steadily in the 1980s, which meant that an opening span bridge was becoming less attractive every year.

A sworn Public Inquiry into the application by Cork Corporation for a bridge order relating to the provision of a two-lane tunnel was held in October 1985. The required inspector's report was submitted in January 1987 to the then Minister of the Environment, Pádraig Flynn. At that point, the report remained on the minister’s desk for some time. The formal reason for this was that the minister “decided that the question of the timing of the crossing should be considered in the broader context of the preparation by the Department of proposals for the medium to long term development of national roads. In this context the operational programme for roads … includes the proposal for the commencement of the downstream crossing during the programme period 1989-1993”.^[4]

A further feasibility study was recommended by the government in 1989 to consider in detail the need for a crossing and the technical, economic and operational aspects of the various modes of crossing. This confirmed the findings of the original Feasibility Study. A further Public Inquiry was held in July and December of 1990, at which consideration was also given to a four lane crossing rather than the planned two lane crossing.

Ministerial approval by way of a Bridge Order was given in 1992 for a four lane Immersed Tube Tunnel. For the purpose of advancing the long term development of the national roads network, the Minister of the Environment had also established the National Roads Authority (N.R.A). Mr. Declan O’Driscoll was appointed the Chief Engineer of that authority and together with Mr. J.D. Shinkwin, Director of Ewbank Preece OhEocha, and Mr. W.A. Fitzgerald, Cork City Engineer, formed an informal Technical Steering Committee for the Tunnel Project.

[edit] Financing and Contracting

The IR£70 million design and construct contract was awarded by the Cork Corporation on behalf of the National Roads Authority. The NRA received financial assistance from the Cohesion Fund of the European Union.

In the early 90s, Ewbank Preece OhEocha (formerly DeLeuw Chadwick OhEocha, and later to become part of Mott MacDonald) supervised a major geotechnical investigation, conducted a hydraulic study of the river, and carried out an environmental impact study. Ewbank Preece OhEocha, in association with Symonds Travers Morgan, produced a conceptual design and tender documents for Cork Corporation on a design and construct format based on geometric and performance specification. Thirteen parties showed interest in the contract. From these, four consortia were selected and Cork Corporation made a final contract decision in December 1994. As is typical on a large-scale project of this type, the chosen contractor was a joint venture of Tarmac Walls JV, formed by Tarmac Construction, now a division of Carillion plc, and P.J. Walls (Civil) Ltd.^[6], part of Ireland's Walls Group. Subcontractors then handled many of the key tasks of construction.

[edit] Construction

Construction involved the excavation of a large casting basin where the tunnel elements or pieces were constructed. After construction of elements was complete, the casting basin was filled with water and joined to the adjacent River Lee, each element was floated out and sunk into position into a carefully dredged river bed. The road surface was laid and the tunnel opened for traffic in 1999.

[edit] Construction Techniques

The chosen method of construction was the immersed tube technique. In this method, a trench is dredged in the bed of the water channel. Tunnel sections are constructed in the dry, for example in a casting basin, a fabrication yard, on a ship-lift platform or in a factory unit. The ends of the section are then temporarily sealed with bulkheads. Each tunnel section is transported to the tunnel site - usually floating, occasionally on a barge, or assisted by cranes. In the Jack Lynch Tunnel, the 610m long reinforced concrete immersed tube tunnel is made up of five elements, each around 120m long, 24.5m wide and 8.5m high. These were constructed in a casting basin located partially on the line of the tunnel south of the river at Mahon. The northern approach was formed by a 120m long floated open ‘boat’ section – the first of its kind.^[5]

[edit] Excavation and Dredging

Dredging International was the chosen dredging contractor, and the value of the dredging contract is stated by them at €12.4 million. The scope of works consisted of dredging the main tunnel trench and subsequently backfilling the completed construction with sand and gravel. The contract provided also for restoration of the riverbed profile and the addition of a rock protection layer. Dredging work was completed between May 1996 and March 1999. 785,000 tonnes of silt and alluvium and 300,000 tonnes of sand and gravel were excavated during the project.^[7]

The trench was dredged primarily by a series of specialized vessels in several stages and with different equipment. Much of the main trench for the Lee Tunnel was dredging by the backhoe dredger “Zenne”. Two barges were used to transport the dredged material 19 km (12 mi) downriver and from there to the disposal site four miles offshore. The cutter dredger “Vlaanderen XIX” removed the underlying fluvioglacial material. A second cutter dredger, “Vlaanderen XV”, was deployed to breach the casting basin bund. A rock layer, encountered over part of the trench line, was dealt with by the jack-up platform “Zeebouwer”. The “Big Boss” was employed to remove the rock. This backhoe dredger was equipped with a “Backhoover” (in effect, a “mini” precision dredger). This system proved extremely effective in removing very thin layers of recently deposited material immediately prior to immersion of the tunnel elements.^[7]

[edit] Constructing the Immersed Tube

The construction involved the pre-casting of 5 tunnel segments and an open boat unit. These were constructed in a casting basin south of the river at Mahon. Each segment was 122m long and weighed approx 27,000 tonnes.^[8] Contractors Tarmac Walls JV engaged RMD Kwikform, a global construction formwork and shoring solutions company, for the formwork on the tunnel and open section elements of the river crossing.^[9]

Each box section measures approximately 24.5m wide x 8.5m high x 122m long and comprised two 9.8m wide dual lane traffic tubes and a 1.35m wide twin walled central tube for services and emergency access. The 1200mm thick base slab was cast first, followed by the 500mm thick central walls. The outer walls and roof were cast together in a single operation, in six nominal 20m lengths, using special travelling formwork. This was struck inside the formed section, moved along to the next length and then jacked up into position, each within a 72 hour cycle. Each 1000 cubic metre pour required approximately 1500 square metres of formwork. The inside shutters for the outer walls were vertical steel section panels and Alform Beam walers, which were attached to the top slab of the special steel traveller, while the outer shutters were crane handled vertical steel section panels with Alform Beam or steel channel walers.

The open top boat unit, measuring approx 40m wide (including two 7.2m wings at its widest point) x 120m long and up to 10m high was cast in two operations using standard formwork. The boat unit and all the tunnel section elements were cast using grade 40N concrete with a percentage of ggbfs cement replacement, reinforcement being high strength and 16 to 40mm diameter.

[edit] Tunnel Operation

The road surface was laid in 1998/1999 and the tunnel opened for traffic on 31st May 1999,^[10] roughly 20 years after the first formal studies had been prepared. The final cost of the whole scheme including feeder roads and not just the tunnel itself was IR£105 million (approx €133 million).^[11] The tunnel has two separate two lane dual carriageways (each carriageway 3.75m wide). There is a service walkway about 1 metre across which doubles as an emergency escape. During periods of maintenance, one tube may be closed and the other used for bi-directional traffic.

The environment within the tunnel is controlled by an array of monitors and a closed circuit TV and traffic control system. External photocells linked to the computer management system provide a level of tunnel lighting most compatible with ambient light levels outside. To assist drivers in adjusting their eyes, lighting gradually brightens as they approach an exit.^[8]

Jet fans located within niches in the roof of the immersed tube sections provide longitudinal ventilation, and the tunnel is equipped with fire and life safety equipment.^[5]

Despite the cost of its construction and operation the tunnel is not tolled. The Feasibility Study for the tunnel envisaged that the crossing could have a toll of 30 pence (in 1981 IR£)^[3] (approximately €1.05 in 2007 money), but the concept of a toll was dropped after political opposition. It was felt that, because of the proximity of the tunnel to the city, the imposition of tolls would tend to encourage some drivers to avoid the tunnel and continue using the city centre streets thus minimising the benefits of the tunnel.

An immersed tube tunnel of similar length is currently under construction in Limerick^[12], as part of Limerick's south ring road. The Limerick Tunnel is being constructed under a Public-Private Partnership scheme signed with Direct Route (Limerick) Ltd. and is being tolled. Limerick politicians are outraged by this, comparing the tolling to the Jack Lynch Tunnel.