User talk:Jabowery
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Jabowery and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
- To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
- Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
- If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
- Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
- Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
- Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Good luck!
Self-confessed Stormfront activist. [1] SlimVirgin 01:38, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] References
Thanks for being a conscientious editor and citing your sources, but including the complete reference mid-sentence is very distracting. The Book Reference template is intended for use in separate refence sections. The references should be moved and a footnote used to indicate the citation. See also: Template talk:Book reference. Thanks, -Willmcw 02:17, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing that. It looks very professional! Cheers, -Willmcw 20:42, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Proto-Indo-European
How much is the theory accepted by scientists? The existence flooding event of Black Sea got disputed over time, AFAIK. Pavel Vozenilek 23:16, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Talk:Holocaust denial
Jim, your comment was out of order. "Jews should not be allowed to occupy positions of trust and authority, either in the public or private spheres, among other peoples due to their ethnocentrism ..." This kind of comment is not acceptable, regardless of which race or ethnicity it's directed against, so please stick to content in future. Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 06:50, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Edit warring on race
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Race. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. -Longing.... 21:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
