Talk:Ivolginsky datsan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article does not cite any references or sources. (September 2007) Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. |
I will enlarge on Itigelov later today, when I have more time. --Ghirla | talk 11:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- I plan to make a separate article about him and to refer to it as to the main in the section about Itige(or i?)lov. It is very necessary free images Kmorozov 12:02, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- OK, go head. I don't think we can find free images though. --Ghirla | talk 15:40, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- We can ask datsan's permission Kmorozov 06:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- I mailed to them. Letter based on the variant Wikipedia:Boilerplate request for permission#Neutrality's semi-formal letter for images Kmorozov 07:22, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- OK, go head. I don't think we can find free images though. --Ghirla | talk 15:40, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Shouldn't the page be moved to Ivolginsk datsan. Ivolginsk is the name of a town, I presume. --Ghirla | talk 13:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- English version of his site is under construction, so we do not know the official spelling. By Google 252 vs. 289 in favour of current version. And not "Ivolginsk" but "Verkhnyaya Ivolga". Kmorozov 14:00, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Correct name is Ivolga monastery. Local peaople call it (Иволгинский Дацан) ivolginskii datsan ,,,,, its full official name is ( Тугэс Баясгалантай Улзы номой Хурдын Хиид),
It was established 1945. Permission from soviet authorities was given in May 1945 .
So its only 61 years old , Itigelov was not able to see it during on his lifetime.--VanemTao 01:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
U can add photos hier on youre page as well. I have plenty of them on my Wiki page where is article whats written by me about Ivolga monastery ,
I took lots of photos by myself when I studied there many years ago.
http://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivolga_klooster
--VanemTao 01:37, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________________________
I wasn't sure where to address this, being a first time commenter, but what other sources are available to corroborate the validity of the monk's preserved state? In my limited search of google I found the same article re-posted and without an author on two different news sources. Beyond that, I'm not sure where the article originated. -CptJailew 8:55 pm Feb.28, 2007