Talk:ITunes Store/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Credit Card required

Although CBS reported you need a credit card or debit card with US billing address, actually you need a credit card not debit card. I tried and it was refused. -- Taku 20:25 May 2, 2003 (UTC)

That may not be the reason, depending on where your card was issued. I often get mine refused (not by iTunes, which isn't available here anyway) because it's issued by a UK bank but I reside in Australia, with an Australian billing address. This seems to be one criterion that is considered a fraud risk even though my card is 100% genuine. As usual it's a case of a security system penalising legitimate users - i.e. it's a bad security system.Graham 23:15, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)

This advertistment should be deleted

Interesting that this Advertisement is not listed for deletion. Is it ok to post an ad if it's about a currently popular topic? Wake 03:12, 17 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Does this still seem like an ad? WP has many articles on business and websites. They should all be notable and written from a NPOV, so if this isn't then it needs some work. It seems OK to me at the moment. akaDruid 12:26, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Needs a tecnology section

I think a Technology section would be good, explaining how some of it works (like how the backend is based on WebObjects and the front end is based on QuickTime (and not WebCore), etc). -- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.94.163.85 (talk • contribs) 06:23, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Missing facts

I love facts. Here are a couple missing from this article:

  • wasn't it called the "Apple Music Store" for a while, until somebody realized that this was a blatant violation of the whole Apple Records settlement?
I don't think it was ever called the Apple Music Store, perhaps for this very reason. It is true that Apple Records have re-opened that court case though, nevertheless. Not sure what the state of play is right now - last I heard Apple Records lost their motion to have the case tried in the UK rather than the USA, but I don't think it's come to court yet.Graham 23:12, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
I seem to remember reading an article a couple of years ago that people got "Apple Music Store" on their credit card bills for the first couple of months that the store was in operation, and it was changed to "iTunes Music Store" later on. I'd really have to dig to find this one now though. --JohnDBuell | Talk 19:17, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
  • I think there should be some mention of the targets: first 1 million (reached early), then 10 million (reached early), and finally 100 million (tomorrow's announcement will probably reveal that it was almost but not quite reached on time).

Anyway, I love facts, but I don't personally know the details on these ones -- could anybody help out? Doops 02:21, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Run on Windows Server 2003?

Does the iTunes music store also work on Windows Server 2003? I don't have a copy of Server 2003 to test it on, but I know that the iTunes application can run on Server 2003, albeit with some minor bugs. --KelisFan2K5 12:02, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Number of Unique users

Anybody now the number of unique users to have used the music store?--209.147.192.49 22:07, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Removed portions

The opening of iTunes Music Store Australia was removed. Future events are usually unencyclopedic, especially if they are unverifiable until they have actually occurred. In particular, Apple tends to be secretive about its future events. —Tokek 23:50, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

  • Australian iTMS opened on 25 October 2005. I have added the appropriate entry in the Internationalization section. -- Canley 06:58, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Criticism

Why isn't there a blurb for critism, controversy, or whatever you call it on the iTMS page? I always see plenty of people making comments on iTunes complaining of ploblems when they download songs; getting drop-outs, repititions, or not getting the song at all. What's the deal?142.46.7.18 20:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I was wondering what point the criticism about being forced to buy from the iTunes store makes when all music costs the same price at every online DRM'ed store? If a song costs .99 cents everywhere, why does it matter that you have to buy it from iTunes Music Service? Am I lessened if I can only buy that .30 cent pack of gum from one store instead of the exact same pack of gum from ten stores? If anything there should be criticism about Apple's lack of subscription support because that is the sole difference between iTMS, Napster, Harmony, Yahoo!, MSN, and anyone else.

The criticism related to regional pricing variations is unnecessary. While I agree that people have complained about the price differences between different countries, this criticism applies to just about every product available on the worldwide market -- from downloadable songs to cars to children's toys to electronics to Harry Potter books. Listing it as a criticism for the iTunes Store makes no more sense than listing it as a criticism against the regional prices of milk. BJ Nemeth 08:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Video Purchases

The new update to the store should be noted and reflected.

Is the one million videos purchased really reflective of its (long-term) popularity? Think of the number of people who simply downloaded videos to try the new service out, or wanted to see how it worked on their new 5G iPod. It's only a $1.99 purchase right? Could have been impulse buying for all I know. One million is a nice rounded numerical benchmark, but it really means nothing since there's no other figures to compare it to. --Madchester 19:19, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
That aside, there was also the fact that video podcasts were supported (without having an iPod that could play video) in the shortlived iTunes 5, and now there's also talk about downloadable iTunes/iPod compatible videos being sold through third parties, such as adult video websites. --JohnDBuell | Talk 19:17, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Can any user worldwide purchase videos? Currently there's no link in the Canadian iTunes Music Store, but if you change the country to USA the Videos link appears as well as the American-geared content. I haven't made any purchases so I don't know if videos are only available to Americans. Mrtea (talk) 01:06, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, the TV shows and animated shorts are for the US iTMS only...so far. But I really don't think it will be very long before you'll be able to get videos purchased from third parties that are viewable on an iPod and with iTunes 6. The catch will be that they will only have Apple's Digital Rights Management for video when sold through iTMS. --JohnDBuell 01:29, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

ITunes Music Store Protocol merged here

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITunes Music Store Protocol. Johnleemk | Talk 11:58, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

False statement

Under digital rights management refering to itunes 4.7.1 the statement reads This adjustment was the result of the renegotiation Apple had with major labels. In 4.7.1, users were further restricted: they were limited to sharing their songs with five computers within 24 hours, rather than the previous five at a time.

I dont know the correct statement someone should fix it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NeverLogic (talk • contribs) 21:23, 17 January 2006.

I have rephrased that sentence. The previous limit didn't exist, users could share songs (via Bonjour) with any number of computers. Mushroom 03:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
No, it is true that iTunes sharing was limited to 5 computers at a time for bandwidth purposes... however, this really doesn't have to do with the iTMS, just iTunes itself. The iTMS sharing is based on the number of computers each account is allowed to authorize. It doesn't matter if the song has DRM or not when you stream between machines you are now limited to a maximum 5 different computers per 24-hour period. -PaulC/T+ 16:02, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I didn't know that. But I knew that the limit is in iTunes and not in the Store. Since that sentence could be confusing, I have removed it. The sharing limitation is already discussed in the iTunes article and it is already listed here under "Features and restrictions". Mushroom 05:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Burning a Playlist

Is it not true that merely changing the order of the tracks in a playlist will allow you to burn it again seven more times?

Why don't you just create a new playlist? And, actually, I don't think that the discussion page is for resolving such matters. --Alexignatiou 20:54, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

The Beatles songs

The article currently lists three Beatles song on iTunes Music Store. However, a search brings up only one album collaboration (In the Beginning) between Tony Sheridan and The Beatles/Beat Brothers (an early alternate name for the band since "Beatles" sounded too similar to a German slang word for penis). In that album, with only one song, "Cry for a Shadow," is solely credited to The Beatles. The only two other songs mistakenly credited to The Beatles are actually instrumental covers by guitarist Pedro Guasti. This article should be edited to reflect this. Egan Loo 19:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

TV Shows Available for Download

I think it would be best if the list of TV shows were split off into another article as a list, as the number of shows available are becoming quite numerous. It would probably be best if a link was included to an outside list as this section will soon take up a large portion of the article. I was going to split this off, but figured that there needed to be some discussion as to whether it should remain or not. Let me know what you think. Nehrams2020 06:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Support, sounds good, go to it! List of video content available for purchase at the iTunes Music Store sounds like a nice title. PaulC/T+ 01:30, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Oppose, for the time being, I believe that the list isn't taking up too much space and is fine. If it gets super long I might support later on.
Amazed by the dedication to keep the list current. The paragraphs immediately above the list about when what content was added to the iTMS seem to be a bit redundant and should probably go away. As long as the list does not grow out of proportion, I see no compelling reason for a spin-off. --Ministry of Truth 01:04, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Highly Support, I think splitting that off would be a very good idea to save some space and allow to keep one specific article to update (since this same list is also referenced at one point in the Ipod article as well). Lets go for it. Though one other option MIGHT be to split it off as "non-music related video content on iTMS", since they are adding Specials and other non-TV based content, plus would allow an easier transition WHEN and IF they start selling Movies or other "Specials". ZyphBear 05:53, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
I still think we need just a few more people to state their opinions before we decide to split this or not. I will create the list starting on June 18th, based on any more opinions that are included. --Nehrams2020 06:41, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Strongly Oppose, I've just outcommented the redundant textual mention of video list content. That saves a lot of space, which was the main argument for the split. The iPod article can refer to the specific section in here just as well as to a separate article. The usefulness to maintain the list will go away at some point in time anyway, just as it is pointless to try to keep up with an exhaustive list of music or podcasts. So not only is there no point to split for now, but we will also have to re-integrate any worthwhile content in the spun-off list at the point in time when it will predictably explode. --Ministry of Truth 00:23, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Support, or delete entirely. We don't list all the musicians whose music is available on iTMS, and I don't see any reason we should list all the TV shows either. Zetawoof(ζ) 03:12, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree that there will come some point in time when this list will naturally go away as it becomes unmaintainable. Until then, I don't see why we wouldn't keep relevant information someone is dedicated to keep current. The edit I made recently to cut out a perfectly redundant text-rehash of the lists early contents make the takes-too-much-space argument a moot point. And as there seems to be no consensus building up for a spinoff, lets just keep it as it is for now. --Ministry of Truth 03:41, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
As Nehrams had declared June 18th to be the deadline and there has been no consensus, I've pulled the split suggested tag on the main page. --Ministry of Truth 02:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Highly Support The list will only get longer, we should take action now.--216.115.228.135 06:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


Second Attempt

Hey, same conversation again, the list has gotten a lot longer, about 250+ shows listed in this section. Will it be better for the article to remove the shows to their own list and link them to the article? Again, I will wait for a consensus for one week. On September 3, I will split the section off unless it is opposed again. Please discuss it here, I am sure the list will continue to grow in length. A separate list would not have the small font and could possibly include images and an introduction. I will add split tag back to the article again. --Nehrams2020 07:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Support. Indeed the list will only get longer. And so long as the list is pointed to from the iTMS entry, I don't see that anything is lost. Just managed. ≡ DISHWASHEЯRAT ↔ (TALK) 12:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
As you didn't add it, I just did. This list is ridiculous. It is completely inappropriate to be in an article. It seems to be demanded by the MoS that this list either be deleted or split. This is a quote relating to lists:

Lists of links, if warranted, should have their own entry: see Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists) for detail. Instead of giving a list of items, the significant items should be mentioned naturally within the text.

The majority of shows (if not all) would not be mentioned naturally in this aritcle. Therefore, the MoS would strongly seem to suggest that it has to be deleted or moved. - Рэдхот 12:38, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Split It's really taking a chunk out of the article. --Falcorian (talk) 01:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Split. Article is very lengthy as it is. Lists shorter than this from articles shorter than this are moved on a regular basis. --Czj 06:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
I agree, and have been bold and split the info off. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 15:29, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

British Office of Fair Trading/European Commission

Does anyone have any more details on the outcome of the referral of iTunes to the European Commission? Or if it hasn't happened yet, does anyone have anymore info. Did they (OFT) lose or what? Cause not too long ago, I e-mailed the europa.eu (then europa.eu.int) site and asked that exact question: Is it not a violation of single-market rules, that shops restrict purchases to credit cards registered in certain areas. What they pretty much said was: no. They can do what they want. But then I saw this. Anyone know? - Рэдхот 09:46, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

pre-order staus

I just created the pre-order status article because this has become important for the iTunes Music Store. It's not very detail and I would like for any of you to elavorate more in this section. I'm not sure if the table is complete but the albums included in there have been on pre-order status.--Toosmart215 02:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Pre-order

pre-order is in consideration for deletion. I believe (no personal reasons) this article should not be deleted, the pre-order in the iTunes Music Store has become widely popular for the release of future albums. At this moment, there are three albums in this status. If the article doesn't seem reasonable to be an article, please emerge it to the iTunes Music Store. The list of the albums release through this method should be taken into consideration.--Toosmart215 02:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Was this deleted? Clicking on the link just takes me directly to the main iTunes store page. I think it would be an interesting article to list all the songs that were only available as preorders. If someone is able to get that information.

Artist Payment

Does anyone know how much artists get paid per album/song download? Does it depend on their contract? I wonder how this compares to how much Russian artists get paid from AllOfMP3.com. Also, I read an interview[1] with Weird Al Yankovic that he gets paid more per CD than per album bought on iTMS. Downhill battle [2] and futureofmusic [3] have more. Kslays 15:08, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Page name change?

Let's not jump the gun, but right now the iTunes Music Store is down (presumably in readiness for an announcement at today's "Showtime" event), and is suddenly calling itself the "iTunes Store" instead of the "iTunes Music Store" - I'm guessing the focus is about to shift from music to music and video - this page will probably therefore need to be renamed iTunes Store accordingly once this change of name has been confirmed by Apple... Mr WR 14:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


Milestones

I removed some text from the "Milestones" section as follows:

 "Apple also introduced the ability to acquire artwork for albums not purchased through iTunes for the first time. iTunes had long been 
 lacking in this feature which Windows Media Player (its primary competitor) had had for quite some time."

This is out of place in the Milestones area IMO since we don't mention any other iTunes client features there. Consider moving to the iTunes client article. PxT 18:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

New features to discuss?

Here are just a few from the iTunes overview page that may be worth bringing up:

  • Automatic album art
  • Download manager (allows you to change the order you download content in, i.e. so you don't have to download the 1.64GB movie before your three 3MB songs)

cluth 19:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Er, oops, I'm a little groggy this morning. I edited the above list to apply only to the iTMS/iTS. The rest should go over to the iTunes article. cluth 19:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

iTunes music store history/trivia

Is is relevant to mention the interface change around early- mid September and the introduction (And possible scrapping) of the "Just For You" feature? TheKillerAngel 23:57, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Infobox pricing

I think the infobox pricing needs to be changed, since prices differ on TV Shows, movies, and games now as well. Either it should be removed, or there should be a different section of pricing for each item the store carries. The store is no longer just a music store, so I don't think that it has been updated since the name switch last week. --Nehrams2020 21:42, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

  • I've updated the prices to show TV & videos as well as movies. Feel free to correct it or clean it up if there are errors -- I just grabbed prices direct from the respective iTunes stores. PxT 16:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Graph of number of sold songs

Like the graph of sold iPods, it would be nice with a graph of sold songs on iTunes Store. And also, another graph of sold music videos, movies etc.. // Cje from swedish Wikipedia 23:40, 24 October 2006 (CET)

I posted a link to an applet with that information for the songs today (I originally claimed that the link had been removed, but now I see it again - weird). I will produce some images and post them, I just want to make the graph a bit better first. Robert Kosara 01:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Lock aspects

Hi User:AlistairMcMillan: Since I couldn't find a comprehensive list of music stores and their DRM mechanisms, I'm fine with the switch from "most" to "other." Do think the sentence you removed is poorly worded, untrue, or simply in need of a citation? I'll try to find a citation and reinsert that sentence when time allows. PuerExMachina 23:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

EU Free Trade Infringements

Should reference to Apple's blatant disregard for EU free trade legislation not be made under the criticism section? Also, does anyone know if there has been any progress in the EC investigation?

87.246.65.245 04:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Bob

Vendor lock-in?

Do you think ITunes contributes to Vendor lock-in? Would it help to have a category identifying Category:Non-interoperable systems? The issue is being voted on, please contribute your vote / opinion: here. Pgr94 23:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

First movie

What was the first movie available to get on iTunes? Wasn't it High School Musical? I'm pretty sure it is, because I got that shortly after it debuted on TV (which was Jan. 2006), and I distinctly remember you could get music videos and TV shows, but not full-length movies yet. Isn't that notable to be put in? Anakinjmt 02:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Yep, I thought so. I've never fully understood the adding in links to the article, so I'll let someone else do that, but here's the source Anakinjmt 05:12, 11 March 2007 (UTC)


sale of LOSSY-COMPRESSED files for $1!

i dont know if this sort of criticism has been echoed elsewhere, but itunes has a glaring weakness: the $1 for a song is comparable to $15 for a cd of 15 songs, but CD's have about 10X the data as mp3's per unit time! this means that on itunes, for the same price as cds, you get much less of the art, much less of the data, etc, plus all the errors that come up with lossy compression (bit aliasing, nyquist frequency issues, reduced dynamic range, etc).... since the itunes store is the premiere site that sells mp3s at such a price, this info should be included. to exclude this very shocking point is to endorse itunes which is a form of bias which violates NPOV. people deserve to know the facts.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 160.39.208.17 (talk • contribs) 13:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC).

Personally I wouldn't pay for music which has lossy compression and DRM at any price, but that's irrelevant. What the article needs is a criticism section based on criticisms of itunes from reputable published sources. LDHan 21:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Even that is generally a bad idea, see Wikipedia:Criticism. -- KelleyCook 21:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
By the way, this guy gets my nomination for the world's most prescient troll. -- KelleyCook 15:09, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

DRM-FREE = Please explain what this means.

Will I be able to put it on a different player than ipod? Will I be able to copy songs from 1 computer to the next if they are both owned by me? Will I be able to burn as many cds as I want? Can I convert to WMA file? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.151.236.165 (talk) 01:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC).

Yes, Yes(you can even copy it to friends, acquaintances and strangers), Yes and Yes(but why would you want to do that?).203.109.167.159 12:50, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

European Commission Investiagation

I think there should be a section added about the present proceedings the European Commission has entered regarding apple and other record companies (see http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/07/126&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en) regarding the inability for Europeans to buy from other European itunes stores and the fact that in Eurozone countries (Ireland, France, Germany) a track costs 0.99EUR but 0.79GBP (1.16EUR).

The companies have 2 months to respond and the European commission could decide to fine Apple up to $2 Billion. Cimex 09:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC)



EXPLICIT on iTunes

I've been wanting to download a few songs (I'm not saying which ones) from iTunes, but they are labeled as EXPLICIT (incorrectly because they have no swearing and no inappropriate lyrics). However, I've also been "hearing" that a song is automatically given EXPLICIT if it is on an album with a PA sticker, even if the song itself is entirely clean. Of course, they also have CLEAN versions, but it really doesn't make any sense to just label all songs on an album with a PA sticker with EXPLICIT especially if it may only be one song that earns the album a PA sticker. Here are a few examples of entirely clean songs given EXPLICIT on iTunes:

SOURCE http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Aq.B.NXCUmu6h7mfBNUTARQjzKIX?qid=20070305201817AAjsiwd

JustN5:12 01:00, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Technically, the songs are labeled "EXPLICIT" is because the album i epxlicit at some points and all the songs are labeled that way. If one song is explicit in the album, the whole album becomes the same too. Another example would be on Justin Timberlake's album FutureSex/LoveSounds, which has some songs that aren't explicit (My Love, What Goes Around...Comes Around Interlude are some examples) but since one song (at least) is labeled explicit and the whole album is labeled explicit.
No offense but I don't think tha should be an issue. --esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 01:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Bitrate Q

At what bitrate and filetype does Apple sell its videos (TV and movies)? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.55.41.183 (talk • contribs) 14:17, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

iTunes software security vulnerabilities

No mention of the data harvesting scandals and security holes. Shouldn't someone tackle this? (Google "iTunes security" for further info) Wiki2020 15:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

First #1 album on pre-orders?

I have removed this sentence from the "Market share and milestones" section:

  • Young Modern, the fifth album by the Australian band Silverchair, to be released on March 31, 2007 was the first album to ever go to chart as number one on iTunes by pre-order.

No citation, and I personally doubt that this is the case, especially since it may have happened only on the Australian iTunes Store. IIRC, I recall seeing Norah Jones's Not Too Late at the #1 spot on the US iTunes Store on pre-orders alone. If someone can say that this claim is indeed fact with a valid citation, then go ahead and put it back. NicolaM 06:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Audio books

This is the same format available if the user signs up directly with Audible.com and chose the "iPod" format. is just plain wrong.

Audiobooks purchased through iTMS are AAC Encoded fairplay protected mp4 files (using the m4b extension, rather than the m4p extension that is normal for fairplay protected files), They also probably (i have not checked) use the chapter metadata system to provide basic chapter markers. (The chapter metadata system supports much more, including illustrations, and clickable hyperlinks [well, clickable when viewed in iTunes]). (The files can be de-protected using QTfairuse, but the file extensions need to be played with for that).

However, when you download files from audible.com, you recive .aa files which use a completely different type of DRM. iTunes and iPod have special support for this format and DRM system, but it is not the same.

The audio itself may be more or less the same, and the books are split up into "parts" like audible's, but the formats are different.

I despise the spliting of a book into arbitrary "parts" just to keep the filesizes smaller. This messes with the chaptering system, and the display of time elapsed since begin of book/ time remaining till end of book. It also has other consequences.

For what its worth, it is possible to create your own audiobooks that iTunes/iPod would treat just like the Official ones. To do this you first need to get the entire audio of the book into one m4a file. This can be tricky. If trying to rip form cd's you may want to rip first to mp3 at a minimal compression level. Then concatenate the mp3 files using some utility that allows you to do that. Then import into iTunes, and right click on the mp3 file and request for it to be converted to AAC. One you have your .m4a file, rename it to use the m4b extension. Now you may want to add chapter metadata and possible illustations. To do this you would use Apple's chaptertool, or any other mp4 metadata editor that supports the chaptering metadata. (The chaptering metadata is also used by the "enhanced" podcasts.) Thats it.

For some reason, even with the existence of AtomicParsley, I have yet to find a good windows GUI editor for iTunes metadata that includes the basic song metadata (including the 'explicit' icon metadata), video metadata (such the tv-show metadata), and the chaptering metadata.

Well Thats all. 67.76.205.110 05:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

No Slovenia citation

Why has someone requested a citation for "EU: EU€0.99/2.49/NA (excl. Slovenia)". If its citation that the Store isn't available there, could they not just look up iTunes and see there's no option for Slovenia? Also, on another note, why are we now using EU€? It looks completely ridiculous since only one currency uses € for the currency sign, so why do we need to disambiguate? - EstoyAquí(t • c • e) 10:48, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Catalogue

I added the fact that there are now 8 iPod Games for download. ~Silence_Knight

What's the justification for saying the store are "about 24 million songs worldwide"? Apple's press release this month claims "over six million songs" in the US store. http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/09/05itunes.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.164.38 (talk) 20:06, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Pricing?

"Volume discounts of up to 20% are available for purchases of more than 25,000 songs.""

This might be true, I don't know, but who would buy songs for $25,000? Is this somehow verifiable?

Peter Sjöberg —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Peter sjoberg (talk • contribs) 20:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC).

I've added a citation for volume discounts - the answer is that it's intended for promotional giveaways like the Pepsi one a while back. It's also worth noting that the conditions seem to be different in different countries, so as it stands the statement describes the US store. --Maebmij 06:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


"Most albums cost $9.99 in the U.S"

It would be nice to add the base album prices in each currency to the pricing section and/or table on the right. By "base album price", I mean the equivalent of the $9.99 US quoted price. 70.80.116.43 03:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

"EU€0.99 in the eurozone (except Slovenia) and UK£0.79 in the United Kingdom." Why do the letters EU appear before the €? I mean, is there any other currency that uses the € symbol for its currency? And if the "UK" were omitted, is there any danger at all that anyone might think a different kind of pound was being talked about? If not, isn't this taking precision to rather unwieldy lengths? -18:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.136.182 (talk)

"plain" AAC or AAC+ ?

Are the records encoded in "normal" AAC or AAC+ (that is classic AAC with SBR)? (aka HE-AAC)

--Xerces8 19:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

AAC Low Complexity - EstoyAquí(t • c • e) 19:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


kevin gray is very intelligent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.236.158 (talk) 23:01, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Australian iTunes Store

Ummm, i think Australian iTunes Store is getting TV Shows and Rentals. Because with the latest update with the Australian iPod store the iPod had a heading stating Rentals. So maybe Australian iTunes store is getting rentals? BatterBean (talk) 07:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)