Talk:ITU prefix
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is supported by the Radio WikiProject.
This project provides a central approach to Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. |
|
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amateur radio, which collaborates on articles related to amateur radio technology, organizations, and activities. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] History
Dear,
I am very interested in the history of the callsigns for radio amateurs. I am, myself, a radio amateur, ON4ZA. Of course I know the prefixes that have been allocated by ITU to various countries. I looked into you web-site to see if I could also find some historical information. In the 1920-s amateur radio got more and more organized. A first IARU meeting was held in Paris with some representatives of national clubs: USA, GB, Germany, France, Belgium... In the very early period the prefixes allocated to European countries all started with E, the second letter being the first of the country. For Belgium the prefix in those days was EB. That system did not last very long. I "guess" it changed when ITU started organizing things.
Some founding countruesn the big ones, had so much influence that they could choose the letters that they wanted reserved for theur amateurs: USA, France, GB, Germany, Italy. We, the smaller, tiny country Belgium, had not that privilege. What I would like to find out is why we got OM-OT in the end? No single letter refers to "B"-elgium? Was there any logic in allocating the callsigns around the end of the 1920's - beginning 1930's? Or was it sheer luck that when they had to give a prefix, after the big shots had choosen their ones, that they followed simply the alfabeth and that when tey had to allocate prefixes for Belgium they had just arrived at OM.....??
Other question. Who allocated the first prefixes: IARU or ITU??
Maybe you can give me some E-addresses wher I can search myself for the answers to my historiacle questions! It might save time at your end.
Thanks for reading me and for any action you want or can undertake at your end.
Fleurbaey Fernand, ON4ZA.
Asterlaan 20n B2550 Kontich. Belgium. E-ddress: t.fleurbaey@skynet.be
- See The ITU's official history page. They've got some factual errors, such as attributing the first audio broadcast to Marconi instead of Reginald Fessenden's much earlier 1906 broadcast.LeadSongDog 18:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Taiwan
Why is the ROC (Taiwan) conspicuously absent from the ITU Prefix list? do they share Mainland China's call-sign prefixes? I've noticed this is with Japan, North Korea, and South Korea, as well.
Raccoon Fox 04:01, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- Regarding the absence of Taiwan from the ITU list, most likely it's due to political pressure from the PRC. According to this site, Taiwan has or continues to use the callsigns BM, BN, BO, BQ, BV and BX. -Loren 07:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Second Table
Should there be a table organized by country? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 1.618033989 (talk • contribs) 09:47, 15 December 2006 (UTC).
- There is one. Refer to List of ITU prefixes by nation and ITU prefix/Grid chart. :) RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 19:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
