Isthmian script

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Upper right corner of the back of the mask uncovered by Coe and Houston. The glyphs are highlighted in pink.
Upper right corner of the back of the mask uncovered by Coe and Houston. The glyphs are highlighted in pink.
Isthmian script
Type Undeciphered (Hypothesized to be logographic)
Spoken languages Unknown
Time period Relatively unknown, perhaps 500 BCE to 500 CE
Detail showing three columns of glyphs from La Mojarra Stela 1. The two right columns are Isthmian glyphs.  The left column gives a Mesoamerican Long Count calendar date of 8.5.16.9.9, or 156 CE.
Detail showing three columns of glyphs from La Mojarra Stela 1. The two right columns are Isthmian glyphs. The left column gives a Mesoamerican Long Count calendar date of 8.5.16.9.9, or 156 CE.

The Isthmian script is a very early Mesoamerican writing system in use in the area of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec from perhaps 500 BCE to 500 CE, although there is disagreement on these dates. It is also called the La Mojarra script and the Epi-Olmec script ('post-Olmec script').

Isthmian script is structurally similar to the later Maya script, and like Maya uses one set of characters to represent logograms (or word units) and a second set to represent syllables.[1]

Contents

[edit] Recovered Texts

The four most extensive Isthmian texts are those found on:

Other texts include:

  • A few Isthmian glyphs on four badly weathered stelae — 5, 6, 8, and probably 15 — at Cerro de las Mesas.
  • Approximately 23 glyphs on the O'Boyle "mask", a clay artifact in a private collection of unknown provenance.
  • A small number of glyphs on a pottery-sherd from Chiapa de Corzo. This sherd has been assigned the oldest date of any Isthmian script artifact: 450-300 BCE.[2]

[edit] Decipherment

In a 1993 paper, John Justeson and Terrence Kaufman proposed a partial decipherment of the Isthmian text found on the La Mojarra Stela, claiming that the language represented was a member of the Mixe-Zoquean language-family. In 1997, the same two epigraphers published a second paper on Epi-Olmec writing, in which they further claimed that a newly discovered text-section from the stela had yielded readily to the decipherment-system that they had established earlier for the longer section of text. This led to a Guggenheim Fellowship for their work, in 2003.

The following year, however, their interpretation of the La Mojarra text was disputed by Stephen Houston and Michael D. Coe, who had tried unsuccessfully to apply the Justeson-Kaufman decipherment-system to the Isthmian text on the back of the hitherto unknown Teotihuacan-style mask (which is of unknown provenance and is now in a private collection). The matter is still under discussion.

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Lo.
  2. ^ Pérez de Lara and Justeson.

[edit] References

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

Languages