Talk:Israel's unilateral disengagement plan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Israel's unilateral disengagement plan article.

Article policies
Archives: 1
Discussions on this page may escalate into heated debate. Please try to keep a cool head when commenting here. See also: Wikipedia:Etiquette.
Israel's unilateral disengagement plan is part of WikiProject Israel, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. This template adds articles to Category:WikiProject Israel articles.

Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
Israel's unilateral disengagement plan is part of WikiProject Palestine - a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page where you can add your name to the list of members and contribute to the discussion. This template adds articles to Category:WikiProject Palestine articles.
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritizing and managing its workload.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the Project's importance scale.
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.

Archive 1: April 2005 - October 2006

Contents

[edit] POV tag on 'Israeli opinion' section

Someone (not me) put text in this section saying "This section is problematic from a neutrality perspective; it chooses not to document the large-scale pro-disengagement rallies throughout Israel on other occasions."

I've removed this text, and put in a POV tag instead. --Apeloverage 09:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Change of name

This disengagement is alrady completed. I propose it be changed to: Israel's 2005 unilateral disengagement or Israel's unilateral disengagement of 2005. --Shamir1 20:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] pre-disengagement murders

There were two instances, I believe, in which anti-disengagement Israeli protesters murdered some Palestinianians hoping it would stop Sharon from going through with it. I was trying to find news stories about the murders, but it's tough. I'm still looking, but if anyone could find them, I think they belong on this page. A student of history 02:19, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Tali Hatuel and her daughters were murdered and some Israelis protested against the disengagement because of it. That is what you might be confusing it with. I dont see how the scenario described above makes sense.. Israelis killed Palestinians as well. I think it was a protest against his plan, an exteme, ugly, and digusting form of protest. I dont know how it was done in hope it would stop Sharon, but it was a protest. --Shamir1 02:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
I found the two incidents I was referring to. I will add them here later. A student of history 19:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
I dont think you listened to my point. It was not done in hope that it would stop Sharon, it was done as a form of protest. --Shamir1 20:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Ok, it was done as a form of protest, I will insert that. You are right. A student of history 17:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Current status"

I removed the "Current status" section, since it seems to refer to the Realignment plan. It contained the following:

After the Israel Lebanon conflict of 2006, Olmert announced to his cabinet that disengagement from the West Bank was no longer a high priority [1].

This info already appears in the Realignment Plan article, and the reference link is broken. 88.155.130.178 19:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Subsequent status of diplomacy

I'm not keen about having news updates posted in articles. On the other hand, there should be a way to concisely have follow-up information included as well. The recent posts seem too much though. --Shuki 19:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Not neutral

This article is too pro-disengagement. Its not neutral.AniChai 18:18, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge

Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Yad La'ahim content has been merged here from Operation Yad La'ahim. The history of that content, for GFDL attribution purposes can be found here. DES (talk) 03:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] interesting ref

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=407447&contrassID=1&subContrassID=5&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y

-- JaakobouChalk Talk 11:24, 30 November 2007 (UTC)