Talk:Isosbestic point
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Comments
These articles should be merged asap. The proper spelling is "isosbetic point" someone who knows how to merge articles should do so immediately.
ISOSBESTIC is the correct spelling.--RobinStokes 05:34, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Done, I merged both articles and made some clean up.--Nevermore78 21:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, all Dears!, but we should think about, and that as soon as possible, to full rework the first part of this article (not the application), as the whole definition and a lot of the explanation is quite a similar mistake as almost all other articles on the NET, including IUPAC & SAS & Co's !!!
- Take a view at Isobestic Point Sorry: ARGOS++ 22:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)