Isomorphic keyboard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
An isomorphic keyboard is a musical input device consisting of a two-dimensional array of note-controlling elements (such as buttons or keys) on which any given sequence and/or combination of musical intervals has the “same shape” on the keyboard wherever it occurs – within a key, across keys, across octaves, and across tunings.
Contents |
[edit] Examples
Isomorphic keyboards were developed by Bosanquet (1875), Janko (1882), Wicki (1896), Fokker (1951), and Wesley (2001). The keyboards of Bosanquet and Erv Wilson are also known as generalized keyboards.
Fig. 1: The Wicki isomorphic keyboard note-layout, invented by Kaspar Wicki in 1896.
[edit] Invariance
Isomorphic keyboards expose, through their geometry, two invariant properties of music theory:
- transpositional invariance[1], in which any given sequence and/or combination of musical intervals has the same shape when transposed to another key, and
- tuning invariance[2], in which any given sequence and/or combination of musical intervals has the same shape when played in another tuning of the same musical temperament.
[edit] Basis vectors
All isomorphic keyboards derive their invariance from their relationship to rank-2 regular temperaments of Just Intonation.
A two-dimensional lattice is generated by two basis vectors, and so is a rank-2 regular temperament of Just Intonation. A keyboard lattice generated by two given musical intervals will be isomorphic in any rank-2 temperament that is also generated by those same two intervals. For example, an isomorphic keyboard generated by the octave and tempered perfect fifth will be isomorphic with both the syntonic and schismatic temperaments, which are both generated by those same two intervals.
[edit] Benefits
Two primary benefits are claimed by the inventors and enthusiasts of isomorphic keyboards:
- Ease of teaching, learning, and playing
- Microtonality
- isomorphic keyboards' provision of more than the usual 12 note-controlling elements per octave facilitate the performance of music that requires more than 12 notes per octave.
A third potential benefit of isomorphic keyboards, dynamic tonality, has recently been demonstrated, but its utility is not yet been proven. Using a continuous controller, a performer can vary the tuning of all notes in real time, while retaining invariant fingering on an isomorphic keyboard. Dynamic Tonality has the potential to enable new real-time tonal effects such as polyphonic tuning bends, new chord progressions, and temperament modulations, but the musical utility of these new effects has not yet been demonstrated.
[edit] Comparisons
Isomorphic keyboards can be compared and contrasted using metrics such as the thickness of an octave's swathe of buttons on the keyboard and the number of repetitions of a given note on the keyboard. Different isomorphic keyboards are suited for different uses. Within the syntonic temperament's broad tuning continuum, for example, the Fokker keyboard is well-suited to tunings of the syntonic temperament in which the tempered perfect fifth stays in a narrow range around 700 cents, whereas the Wicki keyboard is useful over the syntonic temperament's entire tuning range.[6]
[edit] Commercially availabile
Many isomorphic keyboards are commercially available, including:
- Chromatone CT-312, uses the Janko note-layout
- Terpstra], uses the Bosanquet note-layout
- U990, uses the Bosanquet note-layout
- AXIS-64, uses the Harmonic Table note-layout
- Stagi Hayden Duet Concertina, uses the Wicki note-layout, shown in Figure 1 above (known as the 'Hayden' layout by concertina players)
[edit] In development
[edit] Lack of mainstream commercial success
The isomorphic keyboard's two primary benefits -- ease of learning and support for microtonality -- have not proven to be sufficient to propel it into the commercial mainstream. The Thummer is expected to offer the unique additional benefits of high expressive potential, dynamic tonality, tiny size, and a low price. While this combination of power, simplicity, affordability, and uniqueness have often enabled new products to disrupt mature markets, the impact of these additional benefits on the music products market is as yet unproven.
[edit] References
- ^ Keislar, D., History and Principles of Microtonal Keyboard Design, Report No. STAN-M-45, Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics, Stanford University, April 1988.
- ^ Milne, A., Sethares, W.A. and Plamondon, J., Invariant Fingerings Across a Tuning Continuum, Computer Music Journal, Winter 2007, Vol. 31, No. 4, Pages 15-32.
- ^ ThumMusic System.
- ^ Wholetone Revolution.
- ^ C-Thru Music.
- ^ Milne, A., Sethares, W.A. and Plamondon, J., Tuning Continua and Keyboard Layouts, Journal of Mathematics and Music, Spring 2008 (forthcoming).