Talk:Islamic Human Rights Commission

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 WikiProject Religion
Religion Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
This article falls within the scope of the Interfaith work group. If you are interested in Interfaith-related topics, please visit the project page to see how you can help. If you have any comments regarding the appropriateness or positioning of this template, please let us know at our talk page


48px} This article is part of WikiProject Human rights, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the Project page, where you can join the Project and contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the assessment scale.

Contents

[edit] Al-Quds Day, sources

--tickle me 23:43, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] POV edits by 86.130.63.21

Stop it and argue, this is the forth time, thus it amounts to vandalism; you'll get banned after three warnings - This is the second. --tickle me 18:29, 17 December 2005 (UTC)


86.130.63.21's edit: "...which they feel is perfectly acceptable, whereas the British National Party campaigning for the prohibition of the Islamic Human Rights Commission on religious and ethnic hatred grounds is not."

  1. As the IHRC campaigns against the British National Party it's a superfluous truism to state that "they feel [it] is perfectly acceptable" ...to do so.
  2. If you feel that the NPs campaigning against the IHRC is not justified, that's is your POV.
  3. "A fair comment": Comments are for the discussion, but not for the article page.

--tickle me 01:23, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

I don't agree with this admin's decision to handle the ongoing edit war as content dispute. --tickle me 01:32, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Edit war

Hi. This is not simple vandalism, but a content dispute. However, User:86.130.63.21 has been quite unhelpful in backing up his views with evidence. User:86.130.63.21 - your edits are your point of view, and are therefore unencyclopedic. If you can give a reference saying that XYZ believes that the BNP calling for the banning of IHRC is unjustified then do so. But just because it is your opinion that the BNP has no grounds to ban the IHRC doesn't mean this is 1) true, 2) verifiable or 3) encyclopedic. Thanks, Ronline ✉ 08:00, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Suggested merge from Annual Islamophobia Awards

I've suggested a merge from Annual Islamophobia Awards into a new section on this page. Please feel free to comment at Talk:Annual Islamophobia Awards. --h2g2bob 12:31, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree that the award does not merit its own article. Beit Or 15:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
I view that i merits its own article. --Striver 16:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Merge this silly article. Sham awards, low level humourless satire. Merge this or I'll AfD it. David Spart 00:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
I can't beleive you just put that! Munkee madness

[edit] POV and un-encyclopaedic writing been reinserted into this article.

The Islamic Human Rights Commission may or may not be a body that aspires to the same things as do Western organisations.

But this article was littered with POV expressions such as "campaigns against what it sees as violations", "collaborated with" (not backed by reference), "initiated by Ayatollah Khomeini" (not backed by reference) and "feels that the adoption of sharia law is .......".

And hopelessly un-encyclopaedic writing had been re-inserted "In response to July 2006 The Mail and The Sun article IHRC published a press release on 24 July 2006[1] stating the reports "libellous" and "malicious" attacks to IHRC and in particular its chair, Massoud Shadjareh".

Any organisation deservers much better than this. PalestineRemembered 19:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Israeli Propaganda Piece should be deleted

hardly an unbiased piece, its a worthless piece of propaganda anti islamic, anti arab and pro Israel