User talk:IronAngelAlice/Archive index

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, IronAngelAlice, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Enjoy your Wikipedia experience!

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  —Dabomb87 22:44, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


Contents


[edit] Talk:Abortion

Hi, I do not know what exactly is the situation going on at the abortion page, but I agree with Andrew C's proposal to put the positive and the negative effects in context. Abortion is a surgical procedure--one of the safest--but it always will have side effects. Btw, I advise you against forum-shopping. Not that it's not allowed--but it's kind of disputed. Depends on the situation mirageinred 20:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

I understand Mirageinred. I was careful to ask everyone who was involved in the conversation (from both sides of the debate) to comment on the proposal. There is so much going on within the talk page, that I thought I should draw some attention to the "mental health" segment. I wasn't trying to illicit a specific kind of advice. --IronAngelAlice 21:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Ah yes, I came here to mention the same thing. Be careful to adhere to the canvassing guideline. Don't worry, though: I don't think you're not going overboard or anything, but I thought I should give a quick heads up as just a helpful hint in case you didn't know about the whole canvassing thinggymabobber. :P Anyway, thanks for helping to make the site a better place, and cheers. =) --slakr\ talk / 09:00, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Sklar. Again, I was very careful to let those who were already involved in the conversation (pro-life, pro-choice and neutral) know that there was a new proposal. I didn't want to influence the conversation in a specific way - I want the current paragraph to be as neutral as humanly possible (which is why I wanted to get feedback by as many people as possible). --IronAngelAlice 15:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Joel Brind

Why isn't he a scientific advocate? - RoyBoy 800 02:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC)


Oh! Mostly that sentence was just bad grammar. What someone was trying to say is that Joel Brind is a scientist and an advocate for the ABC hypothesis - not that he is an advocate for science in general.--IronAngelAlice 02:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Harry Reid. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tiptoety (talk) 00:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did to Harry Reid. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. Tiptoety (talk) 00:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Harry Reid, you will be blocked from editing. Tiptoety (talk) 00:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

If you don't call this removing content, than i am not sure what you do. Also vandalism warns do not constitue spamming. Cheers! Tiptoety (talk) 00:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I then added that back to a different section. PLease see the talk page. --IronAngelAlice (talk) 01:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

This issue was the result of a complete misunderstanding. It was resolved amicably.--IronAngelAlice (talk) 05:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "See also" items in Feminazi

It is against the Manual of Style's recommendations to put a "See also" link to an article which is already wikilinked in the body of the article. That's why I removed most of those. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

No big; please self-revert, though. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to misandry

Thanks for contributing to this article, which has been subject to terrible POV edit warring for as long as I have watched it. I have given up hope that it will become encyclopedic in my lifetime, but I look forward to any improvements. / edg ☺ ☭ 01:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Collocation of templates

Hello IronAngelAlice, I've seen you copyedit some articles and tag statements which need a reliable source. Well done. It's more handy to use {{subst:Fact-now}} and {{refimprove|date={{subst:DATE}}}} instead. On my user page I have collocated some more templates. --mms (talk) 09:51, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Proofreading the article Antifeminism

Dear IronAngelAlice, I reverted your revert in the article Antifeminism. This sentence was in the article before you began to edit. I'm unable to be more specific as I haven't read the book and I'm not very knowing in this field. It is supposed that the two authors cited argue for this understanding. --mms (talk) 09:47, 23 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] your vandalizing the HPV Page=

YOu have no expertise on the HPV other than a feminist agenda and nonsense. You need to stop vandalizing the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.3.0.2 (talk) 02:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


This user was blocked for vandalism.--IronAngelAlice (talk) 05:06, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR warning on Fetus

At WP:AN3, someone noted that you might be getting close to violating the three-revert rule. Please be careful. -- tariqabjotu 03:53, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Just curious as to what that was about (?)...--IronAngelAlice (talk) 05:00, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
I don't know what it is you did not understand. It seems rather self-explanatory. -- tariqabjotu 05:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC)