Talk:Iron Warriors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Warhammer 40,000, an attempt to expand, update, and improve all articles relating to Warhammer 40,000 on Wikipedia. You may edit this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives for the project.

Contents

[edit] Re: Cleanup

[edit] Possible copyvio

The "Red Elf" external link from this page leads to a page whose text is very similar to this one. Does anyone know if this is a Wikipedia copyvio or a uncredited copy of Wikipedia information? Cheers --Pak21 15:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Battle cry

whoever keeps changing the battlecry to none known please stop as the Iron warriors battle cry is Iron within, Iron without and I'm gettting tired of always having to fix it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.135.116.244 (talkcontribs).

Perhaps it would be more likely to remain if the information were verifiable via citation from a reliable source. Cheers --Pak21 08:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


It comes from the Iron warriors article in Index astartes —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.83.209.102 (talkcontribs).
Well, from what i know "Iron within, Iron without" is the battle cry of the Iron Hands not the Iron Warriors —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Warsmith Claudius (talk • contribs).
actually the battle cry of the iron hands is "The Flesh Is Weak!" and I know "Iron within, Iron without" is the Iron warriors battle cry as I have the index astartes article right here. I also play Iron warriors myself —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.135.116.244 (talkcontribs).
Well i`l accept that untill or if i get more proof, i`ve seen it on gw sometime going to try and find that again and it`s on CoolMiniorNot on some places. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Warsmith Claudius (talk • contribs).


UK WD274 page 20 features Pete Haines Iron Warrior army the article's title is Iron within, Iron without!

[edit] Pale Skin

They retain their Primarch's cold intelligence, paranoia, pale skin and dark eyes, and are noted for a preference for technological methods.

Perturabo, the Primarch had very dark skin, because of this, he was adopted by the Olympians, they were fascinated by him. So someone should change that. --ቢትወደድ 12:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unsubstantiated Opinion?

Having such possibilities sets the Iron Warriors army a lot of steps above other Chaos armies. The common combination of a Daemon Prince leading 9 Obliterators, 2 Troops (minimum requirement), 3 Predator Tanks and 1 Basilisk is probably the reason under the statement "Iron warriors are the most powerful army in the whole 40k tabletop universe".

This doesn't look like something you'd find in an encyclopedia. Looks more like a personal opinion. Should this be changed?Oderic 11:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, I've removed it, since there were no objections.Oderic 13:37, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Changes in the new codex

I've added a small preface to the last section on how it is no longer possible to do an Iron Warriors army the way one would have since Gav Thorpe's holocaust of a new Codex, though I've avoided mentioning any specifics (Obliterators now not 0-1, no more Basilisks etc). |Fuji606 12:30 UTC 6th Sept 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuji606 (talkcontribs) 11:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure, but I think we should remove the part about the Basilisk, since you can't field em now anyway, plus it won't reveal anything from the Codex, since we won't be saying anything anyway. 172.203.105.159 18:50, 20 September 2007 (UTC)