User talk:Ionas68224

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my user space.

My User Page·My Talk Page·Contribs·E-mail me·Arabic and Chinese speakers, Click Here and EDIT

Follow freeman

Why did you just delete the last two edits on this?--P4k 00:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Um, I mean "revert" not "delete," sorry.--P4k 00:42, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

OK, thanks for explaining.--P4k 00:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Brendan Kelly

Sorry! We were reverting edits on that page within, literally, 2 minutes of each other. I added the vandalism note to the wrong talk page. My sincere apologies for the warning. I actually ended up reverting your edit on that one. It's all tidied up now. Sorry for the confusion! Cosentino 01:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Your sig

Hey, I think your sig is malfunctioning; it's coloring pages red -- like here: [1] --Haemo 05:28, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Template:Bibliothequesig

Hi, using the template namespace to hold your signature is not appropriate. You should instead set your signature in your preferences as per Wikipedia:Customisation. I've moved your signature from the template namespace to User:Bibliotheque/sig should you wish to use a template instead of setting your preferences. -- Gogo Dodo 05:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Re your message: Yes, I deleted it. I see that you fixed your sig, too. I was just about to do that for you after I moved it. One thing you might want to do is merge the two font tags together surrounding your Talk link as in <font color="red" face="stencil">. Makes the signature a bit shorter. =) -- Gogo Dodo 05:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

I just finished subst'ing all the signatures you placed that were broken when I deleted the template. -- Gogo Dodo 05:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Melovathejesus

I personally don't this name, but it is allowed. After all, there's a very good member of Wikipedia called User:Jesus On Wheels. But Melovathejesus apparently is a vandal. -Yancyfry

I don't believe so. Like I said, I don't like this username. I don't like Jesus' name being taken in vain, or even used by another person. -Yancyfry

It's nice to know you're here

If you think it shouldn't be deleted, remove the prod warning. Actually, I've done that, and taken it to AfD. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's nice to know you're here - Giggy _U^CP 21:50, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but it's likely to be deleted. Giggy _U^CP 04:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Disruptive talk page messages

Please do not leave disruptive talk page messages or intentionally mislead other users, as you did at User talk:Vitalmove. Thank you. Andre (talk) 06:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Your signature

I like your signature:

bibliotheque (Talk)

…but the red font may cause some Wikipedians to believe that your talk page does not exist, please change it. Thank you!  Tcrow777  talk  02:56, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

How would they think that my talk page doesn't hexist? What does that have to do with red font? bibliotheque (Talk) 03:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

In Wikipedia red colored links mean that the link does not exist.  Tcrow777  talk  07:00, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

But it is a different color red, isn't it? I will change it willingly, I just do not know how my talk would be confused with that. bibliotheque (Talk) 14:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Here is an example: lalala does not exist, your (Talk) page does exist. They are different colors.  Tcrow777  talk  18:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I have now changed it to this. Իօնաս (forgive·disarm·unite) 21:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

What does "Իօնաս" mean? What does "forgive·disarm·unite" mean?  Tcrow777  talk  04:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

"Իօնաս" is my name in Armenian. forive·disarm·unite is my philosophy about the world. Instead of warring, we should move on to forgiveness, disarmment, and unity. Իօնաս (forgive·disarm·unite) 04:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

"Forgive·disarm·unite" might be too controversial to use in your signature.  Tcrow777  talk  05:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

How would it be controversial? Իօնաս (forgive·disarm·unite) 07:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

It would be too controversial because not all users believe in that.  Tcrow777  talk  07:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

I have now changed it to this. j. rand|talk|contribs|email 21:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Did you have your username changed? I do not ask that you change your signature any more (except for any link in your signature pointing to redirects), but I do discourge you from having the link in your signature that points to User:Ionas68224 or User:Bibliotheque being named j. rand, the link should be named Ionas68224.  Tcrow777  talk  02:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Revert: Answer

to this question: [2]

Because you should log in when writing sections in capitalized letters to a userpage to not confuse RC-patrollers, especially as that ip vandalized articles before, e. g. [3] and [4]. --Oxymoron⁸³ 07:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

simple:User talk:Ionas68224

User page redirects

Not to be uncivil, but you know that I am Bibliotheque. My username is now changed, but you cannot say that this is vandalism. I did it as humor to my own user page. It was quite uncivil of you to delete the page User:68.224.239.145. I don't see why not logging in constitutes as vandalism, especially since I have admitted to being vandalous in the past, but now trying to revert vandalism in wikipedia. Not to be rude, just saying. ionas68224|talk|contribs|email 02:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

When exactly did I accuse you of vandalism? The fact that I never reverted your edits should make it clear that I didn't consider it to be vandalism. All I did was ask you to log in when you edit a user page--I don't see how that can be seen as uncivil. Using IP user pages as redirects is frowned upon--this IP may belong to you today, but even "static IPs" aren't permanent. Please use links rather than redirects. Owen× ☎ 05:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for removing the redirects, and my apologies if anything I said made it sound like you were suspected of vandalism. I added bigger notices on your IP pages (User:68.224.239.145‎ and User Talk:68.224.239.145‎). Feel free to change them to whatever is your personal style (or remove them altogether), and let me know if there's anything I can help with. Owen× ☎ 15:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Gyallu modification

Well, the thing that I'm wondering is, who modified it? It looks less correct in places than the YouTube and nationalanthems.info versions. For instance, in the second line, it is clearly Norbue (or norbu, norbüü, etc.), rather than Durbue as the article currently says. As for which is better between the YouTube and nat-anth versions, it's impossible to say, because there is no standard system for transliterating Tibetan. I made a proposal at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Tibetan)/proposal 2, but it has never been adopted.—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 21:36, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Userpage Deletion

Hello, as you can see your userpage has been deleted and furthermore some versions of this page have been removed. I have sent you an e-mail regarding the reasons why this was done and how we can resolve the situation. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 06:35, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

I just sent you the message.--Jersey Devil 06:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't know why you decided to place back the aforementioned information in your userpage after it was discussed. I've deleted it again and will not undelete it. It took me a long time to go over that userpage and remove the information. If you want it back you may recreate your userpage however if any additional personal info is added I will again delete it. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 08:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disrupting and trolling an RfC. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. MastCell ^Talk 19:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Looky <link to wikipediareview.com removed> here. I am not a troll. ionas68224|talk|contribs|email 19:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Your talk page has been protected for the duration of your block. MastCell ^Talk 20:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Evading your block at this point with the IP and Tres apropos (talk · contribs) is not going to help your case.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Do not remove the {{sockpuppeteer}} from your userpage. While you were blocked, you used two different accounts to edit from while blocked. Normally, a block would be extended for such, but in this case it was not. Do not recreate your IP's userpage (IPs may switch at any time), nor replace the messages on the IP's user talk.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Disruption

I'm just going to say this once. Stay out of Ryulong's face, or I'll block you for disruption. It's that simple. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 06:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruption. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 06:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

I do not see which contributions justify this — Cut me a little slack, does this cynicist administration even believe the fact that I am 11 and you are being ageist here? DO YOU KNOW WHAT FACTS ARE?Ionas68224 06:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm certain there are plenty of 11 year olds who are positive contributors, just as there are plenty of older adults who are vandals. Your age is irrelevant in this matter, and I see no reason for you to continue to bring it up. Whether I or anyone else believes you or not is likewise irrelevant. --Kinu ^t/_c 15:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Chiefs and Indians

• "Too many chiefs, not enough Indians" (By the way, in India there are no "tribal chieftains")

I do believe this phrase refers to Indigenous peoples of the Americas, aka "American Indians", not the ones from India. Cheers. ~Kylu (u|t) 06:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Block extended

You have been blocked from editing for a period of six months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry and disruption. jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 01:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Reply to e-mail

I generally do not reply with e-mail, because I don't trust everyone with the knowledge of the e-mail address I use. See User:EnglishEfternamn for why.

No. You simply do not get it. You have gone beyond the realm of getting an assumption of good faith. You simply cannot work on this encyclopedia. You don't know how this website works. You constantly call others Leninist or cabbalist [sic] (it's "cabal" by the way, the Kabbalah which I am very sure you have been accidentally referring to is a Jewish scripture, unless you're intentionally fusing the two), you've been attracted to the topics of favorite to banned users (your attraction to Holocaust denial is really telling of that), and you don't realize why you were initially blocked.

You jumped into the RFC on me because it was brought up on an outside site by someone I must have pissed off there (I can only think of three people I've had any contact with there) and immediately called for my desysopping, despite your not having any knowledge of the situation at hand.

Your statement of "power hungry administrators (most or all of them) were turning Wikipedia into an autocracy, and I of course want anarchy here" makes absolutely no sense. I don't know what the hell you've absorbed at WR, but they've turned you into someone who simply does not fit on this website any more. Also, the use of "[[adminisTRAITORS|certain people]]" is really ridiculous as e-mails through the MediaWiki software do not use the formatting.

I'm not being "fascistic" in any sense of the word as you state in the e-mail. You suddenly popped up out of no where and said, "This admin is bad. He should be desysopped," and expected it. After a comment like that, should I be expected to welcome you with open arms? Should I give you a hug, and twenty bucks and tell you what articles you should look at? No. If you were in my position, you would act exactly the same way. Whatever constructive criticism came up with that RFC, I took in. You did not give any criticism. You just said "Ryulong does not automatically assume good faith. He should be desysopped for a month." There's nothing I can get from that. Other people were saying, "Ryulong should not block immediately. I think he should put thought into blocks before doing them," which I have been doing.

Now, the reason you were first blocked is because you were actively disrupting the RFC. The second time you were blocked is because first addressed me as "hey, Scryulong" and then you were told by jpgordon to leave me alone (which you didn't). The only reason you are now blocked for six months is because you couldn't wait five days to start editting again under this account (your block would have expired sometime on Monday, and User:World Arachny was registered on Wednesday), and you returned to editting your new favorite page. You should be glad that the first two sockpuppets you used didn't make the original block be reset or extended. You really need to change your tone if you want to edit Wikipedia. Right now, you're too far gone to edit this encyclopedia (Oh, and I saw the little hierarchy you have on your Scribblewiki. I don't know why you put me above bureaucrats and at the same level as SlimVirgin and Jayjg. I'm much less important than people listed here)—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 03:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Unblock me

Image:JDR_chinese_peace.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:JDR_chinese_peace.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 15:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)