User talk:InvaderC1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Your article

You seem quite determined to have this article published on our Wiki, I must say. It's worth pointing out, though, that this isn't just a "public Wiki", it's an Encyclopedia that uses the Wiki format. As such, articles like this won't find easy acceptance here without reliable sources demonstrating notability. However, the best advice I can give you right now is, don't panic! Even if the article gets deleted, you can always create a new one. My suggestion is, develop an article on your talk page, find sources, and then ask other editors for input on whether it's ready to "go live" or not. If there is consensus that you've created an encyclopedic article according to our guidelines, you should have no problem moving the article to the main space. I would be glad to help you with this endeavor: just leave a message on my talk page if you like. Good luck! Charlie-talk to me-what I've done 08:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Actually, i was myself debating in the discussion about whether it should stay or go, uppon further though, perhaps for the time being it would be beneficial to have it removed so that a nice, more polished and presentable, as well as relevant and informative entry can be drafted. With more sections for information regarding technical things, as well as a more informative up front explanation. james B

• As I mentioned in the AfD, you may want to look into a userfy for your article. See the AfD for a little more info. LaughingVulcan 15:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

NOTE: Reviews don't have to be good. They just have to exist and the publisher has to be seen as a reliable source. I had the same problems getting over the line with Roguelike (you may like to read it's afd). I hope you know - Roguelikes are open source free games too.Garrie 22:18, 24 June 2007 (UTC)