User talk:Interlaker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 Notability of Cassiya
2 Tigre
3 Lavochkin
4 Welcome!
5 License tagging for Image:Echoparakeet.jpg
6 OH SHI-
7 Nonsense of Nakui
8 Speedy deletion of La Pulqueria
9 Speedy deletion of Stevhen Iancu
10 Speedy deletion of Cities I've Never Seen
11 Speedy deletion of Outernational
12 AfD nomination of The Papsmears
13 Speedy deletion of The Papsmears

Notability of Cassiya

A tag has been placed on Cassiya, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kai A. Simon 20:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

If you contest the speedy deletion of the article, that's fine with me. Howeve,r I suggest that you expand the article to meet wikipedia standards. Maybe you start with adding a stub tag and expand it then. I wouldn't insist on the deletion then. Cheers. Kai A. Simon 21:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Tigre

Forgive my ignorance--what exactly do you mean? Ben 20:09, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lavochkin

No trivia in Wikipedia articles unless it is especially notable per WP:AVTRIV and WP:Air guidelines.
No uncited additions. The burden of proper citation rests with the contributing editor -- no credible relevant citation (WP:CITE) gets a revert. - Emt147 ^Burninate! 22:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Hi Interlaker, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for your contributions, I hope you decide to stay and contribute some more. If you have any questions feel free to ask me. Simply edit my talk page (or you can click the link on my talk page which says "Start a new talk topic" to make it easier). I will get an orange notification (as you would have for this message) and will respond as soon as possible. You can also ask for help by placing {{helpme}} on your talk page, someone will soon turn up to help. When you edit a talk page (talk pages are for discussion like this page), please sign your name with 4 tidles like this: ~~~~ or by clicking the button like this:. It signs your username and the date and time, making it easier for everyone. Here are a few links that I hope help:

Remember that you can ask me for help any time. So have fun editing! James086^{Talk | Email} 23:37, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Echoparakeet.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Echoparakeet.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] OH SHI-

oh shi- lol y halo thar /b/ro--hnnvansier 04:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nonsense of Nakui

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nakui, by Dekimasu (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nakui provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nakui, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of La Pulqueria

A tag has been placed on La Pulqueria, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Spellcast 20:23, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Stevhen Iancu

A tag has been placed on Stevhen Iancu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 19:15, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Cities I've Never Seen

A tag has been placed on Cities I've Never Seen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

[edit] Speedy deletion of Outernational

A tag has been placed on Outernational requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Loonymonkey (talk) 20:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of The Papsmears

An editor has nominated The Papsmears, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Papsmears and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of The Papsmears

A tag has been placed on The Papsmears requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 05:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)