Talk:Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Books Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

This article is supported by WikiProject Objectivism, which collaborates on articles related to this philosophy. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.

Shouldn't this have the philosophy book category label? uriah923^(talk) 19:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

An edit war over the inclusion of categories? Seriously? The book is obviously a philosophy book, so why wouldn't it have that category tag, Buridan? uriah923^(talk) 17:11, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Honest... I wouldn't kid you. There is now a section at the bottom of the List of Philosophy publications talk page titled, "mediation" where that is exactly what is being debated. I'm just about to put a reply there. Give me a minute and take a look. Also, should you be willing, I'd love to see you make a comment as well. SteveWolfer 18:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

You have a link to the discussion? Crazynas ^t 21:12, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes, the discussion is near the bottom of the Discussion tab's page in a section called "mediation" (and for several sections above that) for theList of publications in philosophy‎ - I don't know how to do the Wiki formatting to make that come out right, but here is the URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_publications_in_philosophy SteveWolfer 22:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

This link works Talk:List_of_publications_in_philosophy#mediation (user:Uriah clued me in) SteveWolfer 22:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Rand - ITOE.jpg

Image:Rand - ITOE.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)