Talk:Interstate 95 in Pennsylvania

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics	Interstate Highways Pennsylvania State Highways
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force.

	Philadelphia Portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage and content of articles relating to Philadelphia, its people, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
	This article is also supported by WikiProject Pennsylvania.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	Interstate 95 in Pennsylvania has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
April 3, 2007 Good article nominee Listed

[edit] Good article

I'm not bold enough to pass this myself, but I do think it meets the criteria. However, it's not ready for "featured" status yet, since the reliability of the roadgeeking sites that are cited could be questioned. -- NORTH ^talk 06:18, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I agree that it's got a long way to go to meeting the lofty FA standards, but I'd say it certainly mets the GA criteria. Regarding the reliability of the sources, both phillyroads.com and interstate-guide.com cite their sources, so I'd say they're reliable secondary sources. Krimpet (talk/review) 06:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, like I said, it's definitely good for GA. And, yes, they're good starting points as sources. It's just that in my work, I've found quite a few inconsistencies at nycroads.com, and interstate-guide.com tends to have a lot of speculation. When this article takes the next step, some more official sources would be good.

Interstate 295 (Delaware-New Jersey), which I expanded myself and passed through GA last month, has the same "problem". It's not really a problem, just something to keep in mind. -- NORTH ^talk 07:16, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA status

I was bold enough to join the project to review articles. I agree, it's good for GA. --myselfalso 21:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)