Talk:Interstate 496

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics Interstate Highways Michigan State Highways
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force.

[edit] The change

I took the route descripition info and renamed it the Lane Configuration since guess what that is what what was typed out. A route Description is actually a prose peice that tells how it moves and what direction it moves. --Mihsfbstadium 21:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

That is not WP:IH compliant. Please follow guidelines.  V60 VTalk · VDemolitions · VRoads 21:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Why dont you understand the diffrence. --Mihsfbstadium 21:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
You need to read WP:IH, as there is no difference. Lane configurations should be mixed in with the route description, as the route description describes where the highway goes, and what lane configurations there are in that section.  V60 VTalk · VDemolitions · VRoads 21:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
I dont think you understand the concept of what I am saying. The tag was put on the exit list only. Which as far as I am concerned appears to be compliant and ZERO info was provided to say what was wrong. That is not playing fair. I could start throughing tags out myself on other states projects too but I dont. I rather FIX them than tag them. If the tag was on top of the article I would expect to see the tag show what needs fixing. But frankly since this is still a stub and a work in progress it would be pointless. --Mihsfbstadium 21:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)