Talk:International reaction to the 2007 Pakistani state of emergency

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International reaction to the 2007 Pakistani state of emergency article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is part of WikiProject Pakistan which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan and Pakistan-related topics. This article is related to Politics of Pakistan. For guidelines see WikiProject Pakistan and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

[edit] UN?

Anybody have any clue what the UN's Reaction has been? Cryo921 09:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Haven't found anything yet. Joshdboz 15:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Nothing in the news section of their site. The thing is this would be really important to have in the article. Cryo921 16:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

The UN is totally irrelevant these days. -- Koranimal Control —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.98.82 (talk) 05:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Found something [1]can somebody add that into the article,i'd do it myself but i don't have the time right now. Cryo921 15:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Done. I've also added a reference to the main article and the detained UN official's article. ZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 18:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Iran

Nothing from Iran yet? BradMajors 05:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Nothing. There's talk of a pipeline deal, but nothing touching on this incident. ZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 18:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] US aid

It should be noted on the US section, that the reason aid isn't going to be suspended is because most of it goes directly into fighting terrorists. Contralya 19:30, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Then please just add a citation backing that claim, rather than tagging the article with a NPOV template because you feel it is "anti-american". I don't think anyone's questioning the motives of the US or any other nation which hasn't suspended aid to Pakistan due to what has happened recently. Musharraf's presidency was no more legal two years ago than it is now that he's suspended the consitution. --Ace ETP 20:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)