Talk:International Cricket

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

cricket ball Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability
International Cricket is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] General Description of the Game of Cricket

A lot of the talk surrounding the rules of cricket itself seem to be written by someone who is not too familiar the game - I'm not trying to be harsh but if a more concise breakdown of the game could be given that would be favourable.

I'm not even sure a breakdown of cricket is needed in this page about the video game, maybe just a link to the rules of cricket would suffice - for example "Follow this link to read more about the rules of cricket.

Furthermore, it's been a while since I played it but I have a feeling the Allan Border's pseudo-name in the game was "A. Boulder", not "A. Bowler" as mentioned in the article. I have the game at home so I'll check on this. --Brebster 04:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

It's absolutely ridiculous to have that section in at all. Most people in England don't have a clue how ice hockey rules work, for example, yet we don't have such a section in the NHL series article. The link to cricket right at the start is enough for anyone who stumbles across this page and is curious. That being so, I'm being bold and removing the section entirely. Loganberry (Talk) 23:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Good call - agree completely. The link to cricket should suffice if anyone wants to read the rules. Brebster 23:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)