Talk:International Brigades

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spain Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Contents

[edit] "National representation" section

I've been thinking further about Hestemand's comment in English?. Probably the best way forward is to tabulate the information from different sources by nationality. I've started a new article for this International Brigades data (which in the fullness of time can also include national breakdowns of casualties etc). Roger 06:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Now updated, with refs from Thomas' 4th ed. The new layout will make it easier to add data. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Roger Davies (talk • contribs) 09:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC).
Now updated, with refs from Thomas' 4th ed. The new layout will make it easier to add data.(unsigned earlier, blush) Roger 09:32, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] English?

The Nationality section refers to "English" volunteers. I'm not being funny here but should this be "British"? Or have the Welsh, Scots and N. Irish been accounted for elsewhere?

Roger 12:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Don't count on anything from the nationality section; it's a mess. We really need sources to support those numbers. Until recently it was claimed that 10,000 Scandinavians took part, which is utter nonsense. Please do correct if you have sources. Cheers, Hestemand 12:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Agreed about the sources. I have a fair number of books here. I'll have a rummage. Roger 20:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
[Later ...] I've found this (the source for the figures is André Marty, who should know, I suppose):
Of the estimated 53 nations from which volunteers came, the largest contingent was the French, about 9,000. There were also up to 5,000 Germans and Austrians, 3,000 Poles, 3,000 Italians, 2,800 Americans, 1,800 British, 1,600 Belgians, 1,660 Yugoslavs and 1,500 Czechoslovakians.(11) Even inside the different contingents there was often a wide range of nationalities. The US contingent was made up of volunteers from 35 different national groups. Of 1,448 Canadians who went to Spain there were at least 14 different ethnic groups represented and 498 were of Eastern European origin. Jews were particularly prominent in the International Brigades, making up between 30 to 40 percent of US volunteers and between 3,000 and 7,000 of the International Brigaders as a whole. There were 81 Afro-Americans in the Abraham Lincoln Battalion, nearly all of them Communists, and for the first time in US military history a black officer, Oliver Law, led white troops into battle.(12) [[1]]
Exceptionally interesting piece I thought. We could do with some of that command of the subject and scholarship here!
Roger 22:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

It's good to see that our Canadians also took part in the fight against nationalists in Spain. This little contribution on the side of the good and reason (like always), is certainly incorporated in the celebration of Remembrance Day. Regards, cheers;24.86.110.10 (talk) 23:13, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Flag

Is the flag depicted on this page one that was used during the war, or is it a modern combination of two designs: the three-cornered star & the flag of the Spanish Republic? --Apeloverage 13:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

The latter I think. Roger 06:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Removed [[Image:Flag of the International Brigades.svg|thumb|right|200px|Flag of the International Brigades.]] as it is of dubious historical provenance (very pretty though :). Replaced it with the IB star. Roger 15:55, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
I've removed it too! Hopefully this won't lead to a revert war. --Apeloverage 11:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pact?

Hitler-Stalin Pact or Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact? Hitler-Stalin Pact betrays some bias, doesn't it? It mainly is used by Historians with a certain anti-communist political stance. --84.195.233.101 17:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Dates

How come the year is missing in the dates in this article ? Hmmm.... When did this happen ? -- PFHLai 04:33, 2004 Oct 14 (UTC)

Usually, the year is mentionned in the beginning of a section and the dates refer to this year. I though mentionning the year for every instance would be somewhat "heavy"... but you're free to correct this if you think it's necessary. Rama 05:54, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Orwell

I see that Orwell is listed as being "involved" with the International Brigade - I'm not an expert, but his personal page says that he was in the POUM, which while not "the other side", was certainly another side (and, in fact, I don't know if he would have fought against the Brigade in Barcelona or not.) Should he be listed on this page? (anonymous coward)

I was thinking the same thing. Yes, he was with the POUM which is not related to the International Brigade. --Tothebarricades.tk 03:26, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Good point ! Rama 07:46, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Orwell would not have been involved in the failed Trotskist uprising In Barcelona as he had already been invalided home after being wounded in action against Italian troops. Although not a member of the brigades he certainly deserves mention as a volunteer for liberty Redvark 11:00, 15th Nov 2004 (GMT)


Orwell was indeed caught up in the May fighting, after partially recovering from his wounds; the second half of Homage to Catalonia is an account of the disturbance, his escape, and a criticism of attempts in most socialist publications to portray the conflict in Barcelona as a failed Trotskyist uprising (and, really, whoever you support, the real conflict was between the communists/government and anarchists).--Djmit44 21:00, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Orwell keeps coming in and out of this article... we really should do something about it ! Perhaps a section "personalities who were NOT in the Brigades" ? :D Rama 19:26, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] on personalities including Orwell (who were or were not in the brigades)

I have taken the step of removing a para in the introductions which read:

Many important artists and writers were in Spain at the time, including W.H. Auden and George Orwell. Ernest Hemingway also was there as a war reporter for the NANA, and spent time on the front line -- see For Whom the Bell Tolls, as well as André Malraux (l'Espoir), or Simone Weil.

I am not 100% certain, but I think that not one of these people were in the international brigades. Orwell, of course, was with the POUM; Hemingway was a journalist; Malraux a pilot. Weil with the CNT as I understand it, and was Auden at the front at all?

If other people feel strongly about having a focal para on celebrities at the beginning of the article, maybe someone should write one about actual members. I would argue:

- The issue of artist and writer involvement is certainly of interest, but it is dealt with on the main spanish civil war page where famous names are mentioned. Or perhaps there is a rationale for a dedicated page on artistic impact of the war?

- There is a section on personalities anyway further down.

- Personally I think - why do we need such a focus on a cult of celebrity when we talk about these volunteers? The vast majority of them, in the IBs and in the militias, were ordinary working class people willing to fight and die for their beliefs. Do they need glorifying with the names of writers and artists? --Bengalski 19:06, 2 September 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Sculpture

I'd like to put something on the sculpture by Ian Walters in London that reads:

"They went because their open eyes could see no other way" Should it go on this page, or elsewhere? Mark Richards 21:10, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I think this certainly has its place on the page. Now, the question of where ("Status of the Brigades after the war" or a new section ?), I'll leave it to your imagination ! :) Do you have a photograph of the statue ? Rama 21:26, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ken Loach

The article says "Ken Loach is not sympathetic to the brigades", which is a complete nonsense. Loach is a socialist, of course he's "sympathetic" to th IB. The film in question, Land and Freedom, is critical of the Stalinists, manipulated from Moscow, who controlled and distorted the efforts of the Republicans - he's not critical of the fighters or the idea itself.

But Ken Loach portrays the IB as Stalinists. Do you consider that "sympathetic". He portrays POUM are heroes and IB/PSUC as traitors. --Soman 08:00, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

No, the point is that the idealism of the IB was manipulated by Stalinists in the Republican government. This is a criticism of the policies of Stalin and Moscow, not of the International Brigade or their fighters, whom the film clearly shows as heroes. --Kingcal 5 April 2006

Do they? In general IB are not given very much prominence in the movie at all. One of the few scenes that actually show IB soliders is the one at the bar in Barcelona, were English-speaking IB soldier talk bad about the militias. The notion that IB were manipulated morons is hardly a sympathetic portrayal. --Soman 09:40, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


It's not a matter of being "manipulated morons". Most of the people who fought in the IB followed the line from Moscow because they believed the SU to be the only socialist state in the world. They followed the line because they thought it would lead them to victory, not because they were stupid. --Kingcal 14:46, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm the person who first put Ken Loach on to this page, in the context of his film 'Land and Freedom'. Whatever the truth of the situation was, the film certainly portrays the International Brigades and the Communist Party as on the wrong side (the main character describes the Party as "evil and corrupt" I think). --Apeloverage 13:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Apolônio de Carvalho

It is not referred to IB members of portuguese or brazilian origins. Concerning Brazil approximately 20 citizens from brazilian origin would have rejoined the IB with in particular Apolônio de Carvalho (see http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apol%C3%B4nio_de_Carvalho) What about portuguese ? Is there some information, files about them ? Thank you for your answer

--81.255.121.101 11:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Added additional info on the main nationalities and the mixed brigades--68.32.11.74 20:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Communism?

Why is this considered part of the "Communism" series? FFS

I don't know. It certainly shouldn't have the huge Communism template plastered all over it. Roger 09:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
I've removed the {{Communism}} template and replaced it with the Spanish Civil War Campaign Box. The latter seems more relevant and significantly less POV. Roger 15:50, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

This is part of communism because many of the International brigades where communists, even where not organised by the Soviet Union (which most where, once the effort really got underway). Communism also used their example as a major propaganda tool. However I do agree that the comunism box was misplaced. Ingolfson (talk) 11:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nationalities

Isn't it strange that Russians/citizens of the USSR aren't mentioned there? --Bicycle repairman 16:21, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Rectified Roger 09:26, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

In his book "The age of extremes", Eric Hobsbawm states that there were at least 5000 Soviets fighting for the IB (although we still don't know how many of them went there voluntarily, he adds).

I also have further doubts about the numbers in the "nationalities" section. "Scandinavian" is not a nationality in any way. Second, the number 10.000 must be a mistake, given the fact that Sweeden, the biggest scandinavian country, sent only 500 volunteers, according to the List_of_Swedes_who_died_in_the_Spanish_Civil_War article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.254.36.183 (talk) 12:10, 6 January 2007 (UTC).

Only about 500 Danes went as well, of which half fell [2]. So, that's 1000 Scandinavians accounted for. That leaves quite a number for the Norwegians, but according to the Norwegian Wiki "only" 100 Norwegians died fighting for the brigades. The 10,000 count seems completely unfounded. -- Hestemand 16:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm also dubious about the nearly 1000 Irish, and have asked for clarification on the wiki page linked. I suggest if no POV source can be found, that this is removed from this page 158.42.250.70 (talk) 18:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC) .

[edit] Sweeping Statement

"Since the fall of the Soviet bloc, the International Brigades have been quite unanimously regarded as anti-Fascist heroes, and the legitimacy of their fight has, for the most part, washed away the stain of summary executions and Stalinist manipulation"

Oh, that's so rich. Says who? Bit of an opinion there, eh?

[edit] Battle of jarama section

Just a little comment: the goal of this battle was not to capture the madrid-andalusia road. It was capturing the madrid-valencia road the aim that the nationalist rebels were looking for. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.146.50.254 (talk) 11:37, 15 February 2007 (UTC).Don severo 11:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The whole Jarama piece is lopsided, too much focus on the British and Lincoln battalions. It needs re-writing really.Roger 09:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Sierra de Terruel poster.jpg

Image:Sierra de Terruel poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 10:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] How many International Brigade Veterans are left from the Spanish Civil War???

Very interested to know, how many of these veterans are still with us today? I imagine the youngest would be about 95, or perhaps there'd be a handful younger than that. But surely most of them would be fast approaching 100 - and there as such probably wouldn't be many left?

Does anyone know?202.139.104.226 (talk) 08:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Seeing that there wasn't anything like neraly complete record-keeping or an over-arching post war organisation - what with an estimated 50-or-so-nations, the question is all but unanswerable, really. Ingolfson (talk) 10:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC)