Talk:Interactive C

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Interactive C is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, an attempt to standardise coverage of Robotics. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.

There's an unsigned comment: "This code is currently being developed. If you aren't a developer, leave it alone until April 8, 2006." I suppose I should just ignore this because it is obviously after April 8, 2006. I don't understand why it's there, though. I suppose I will delete the message if I don't see any discussion of the topic here after a while. I see that the page is a stub and I have experience with IC 3.2 at The Ohio State University. I'll be adding info, but let me know if anyone has different ideas. ~Kruck 16:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

This article refers to Interactive C version 6. This appears very different from the Newton Labs IC that I used at OSU this year, though. Its most recent version is 3.2 . What is the connection between the Newton Labs version and the Botball language described in this article? ~Kruck 16:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed Deletion

I definately think that this article should not be deleted. I will soon update the article in reference to the Newton Labs version of Interactive C which is familiar to me, but I will have to research what the Botball IC language is and how it is used.

It is understandable that this language is not known to users of the C programming language because Interactive C is is a "compilation environment" for robots and embedded systems which is meant to be a stripped-down version of C simply to make it easy to use.

~Kruck 21:47, 28 July 2006 (UTC)