Talk:Intelligent Giving
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Keystone
I moved this: Keystone - organization working on charities' accountability
from the article page because it does not yet have a Wikipedia article and the name directs to a disambiguation page (which is a "really bad thing" to do to readers). If someone who know a bit about the org can start an article (assuming the org would meet Wikipedia's standards) we can link to it from the see also section. -- Siobhan Hansa 17:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] References
I've tried to add some references. Most are from IG's own website - which I don't think is a problem for the things they're used for, but feel free to disagree (and hopefully find better ones!). Would be good to have more from other places though, especially on IG's actual process and impact rather than what they say is their process and impact. Also more on the sector response would be good. Their have been some great additions, the article really seems to be shaping up. -- Siobhan Hansa 18:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- I am a bit suspicious of the "good and bad responses from charities in equal measure": none of the good ones are listed here: are they somewhere? --BozMo talk 22:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- They do exist - on the site's 'About Us' page, they quote a few charities who have reacted positively. Though whether this justifies saying that 'good and bad' responses were attracted in 'equal measure' is another thing entirely... Cameronweaver 08:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
