Talk:Integrated Video System

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Sources used to produce stub

I didn't feel that commercial pages were worthy of being references, however I should mention how I came to the material I wrote.

• Videoconferencing Systems at TANDBERG, as evidence the term applies to videoconferencing systems
• Sony DAVS500 Integrated Video System as evidence of home theatre systems
• SkyOS Integrated Video System at OSNews.com as evidence of video driver (I think)
• Laboratory for Integrated Video Systems, as evidence of further divergence of the term (I don't know what LIVS does)
• CPU Article - Integrated vs. AGP as evidence of CG hardware

Also, I used {{tech-stub}} rather than one of its children intentionally. This is because the term is generic and applies to many different stub categories. BigNate37_(T) 07:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Intelligent video surveillance

The article claims "Integrated Video System, or IVS, is a term used to describe some ... surveillance and security systems ..." Maybe that is true, but what about the other IVS "intelligent video surveillance" [1]? Should we add a paragraph to this article about "intelligent video surveillance", or does it need its own article? --65.70.89.241 21:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

If it's related to the subject outside of having the same initials, then perhaps add a section for it. If their main relation is the IVS initialisation, its best to add an intelligent video surveillance entry at the IVS article, which is a three-letter combination disambiguation page. BigNate37_(T) 21:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.

The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 03:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)