Institute for Defense Analyses
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA) is a non-profit corporation that administers three federally funded research and development centers (FFRDCs) to assist the United States government in addressing important national security issues, particularly those requiring scientific and technical expertise.
Contents |
[edit] Centers
The IDA Studies and Analyses Center is the largest of IDA's three FFRDCs and is co-located with IDA headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia. It includes the following divisions:
-
- Cost Analysis and Research Division (CARD)
- Information Technology and Systems Division (ITSD)
- Intelligence Analysis Division (IAD)
- Joint Advanced Warfighting Division (JAWD)
- Operational Evaluation Division (OED)
- Science and Technology Division (STD)
- Strategy, Forces and Resources Division (SFRD)
- System Evaluation Division (SED)
The Science and Technology Policy Institute (STPI) supports the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. It is located in Washington, DC.
The IDA Center for Communications and Computing supports the National Security Agency.
[edit] Work
IDA's work is primarily in producing studies and analyses for the federal government of the United States on defense and scientific issues. IDA works only on projects sponsored by the U.S. federal government. Most of IDA's Studies and Analyses Center's work supports the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of the Department of Defense, though additional studies have been done for the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and other agencies and offices.
[edit] Staff
IDA employs more than 1,300 research, professional, adjunct, and support staff. Its primary locations, all in the United States, are:
-
- Alexandria, Virginia
- Washington, DC
- Bowie, Maryland
- Princeton, New Jersey
- La Jolla, California
IDA's staff comprises research staff and administrative staff. As of December 2006, the IDA Studies and Analses FFRDC research staff had the following characteristics:
- Degrees:
- Doctoral: 60%
- Master's: 31%
- Bachelor's: 9%
- Discipline:
- Math, Statistics, or Operations Research: 24%
- Engineering: 22%
- Physical Sciences or Life Sciences: 20%
- Economics, Social Sciences, or Political Science: 16%
- Computer Science: 10%
- Business Administration/Management or Humanities: 8%
As early as 2002, the President of IDA, Retired U.S. Air Force General Larry Welch, was being paid an annual salary of $323,979, according to IDA’s Form 990 for the year beginning Sept. 29, 2001 and ending Sept. 27, 2002.
At least ten other IDA executives were also paid annual salaries of over $140,000 in 2002. For instance, the IDA Vice-President for Administration and Finance, Ruth Greenstein, was paid an annual salary of $261,212, while the IDA Vice-President for Planning and Evaluation was paid $212,554. Annual salaries of between $196,889 and $231,076 were also paid to the directors of IDA’s five weapons research divisions in 2002.
In addition, the chairman of the IDA board of trustees, former University of South Carolina President John Palms, was paid an additional $27,100 in 2002 by IDA for his work as IDA board chairman. MIT Professor Sheila Widnall, a former Clinton Administration Secretary of the Air Force, also was paid an additional $10,800 in 2002 by IDA for apparently representing MIT on IDA’s board of trustees in 2002.
Although IDA is a non-profit, from its Pentagon weapons research contracts in 2002 it earned total revenues of $145 million that were $4 million more than the $141 million it had to spend on its weapons research think-tank activity. These funds are spent on internally-initiated research projects.
According to IDA’s 2006 Annual Report, between 1996 and 2006, “Operation Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom was examined” by IDA researchers “for lessons for future joint military operations and for operational test and evaluation programs.”
[edit] Other Information
In order to preserve its impartiality, IDA maintains a low profile and minimizes contact with the press. However, IDA's status as a defense-related organization has sparked controversy, most notably during the Columbia University protests of 1968.