User talk:Inforazer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Inforazer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Forums
Wikipedia is not a forum, and fan discussion should be removed from talk pages in the article namespace. This is policy, please do not report me. Highway Daytrippers 16:05, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes you do, especially when the conversation is detrimental to the writing process. Please assume good faith. Highway Daytrippers 20:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Article talk pages are for discussion of the article, not the subject. Before it turned into an argument, that thread/topic/thing was a general discussion about whether or not Palkia looked like a water type. -- Steel 20:42, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- And where exactly does it say that? -- Steel 13:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Neither of the two pages you provided have anything to do with this (least of all WP:NOT). What is relevant however is Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines, which says that discussions must be on-topic. -- Steel 14:02, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] races versus breeds`
races are not domesticated. virtually no active evolutionary biologist likens subspecies to breeds today. Slrubenstein | Talk 09:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
You are ignorant of recent research by evolutionary biologists. Slrubenstein | Talk 13:50, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] tiger
Thanks. Actually we should all thank the user 85... for his explanations. He is the most objective one. Take a look. The other users are acting without logic. I'm getting tired of their stiff minds.BJK1903 15:06, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WP:NPA, inappropriate comments warning
This comment, [1], is totally unacceptable on Wikipedia. You need to withdraw it and apologize. Do not make similar comments in the future or you will be blocked from contributing. Please become familiar with and abide by WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. FeloniousMonk 17:43, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Last warning, withdraw the comment and the additional one you made on my talk page as well. FeloniousMonk 17:48, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
==Do Not Remove Warnings== Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 17:58, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked
Your responses, [2], [3], [4], [5], ignoring warnings over these, [6], [7], and your admission of using sock puppets has earned you an indefinite block. Please feel free to ask for unblocking once you've rethought your position and method. FeloniousMonk 18:01, 4 October 2006 (UTC)