Template talk:Infobox Weather/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Add colors?

Recently, I noticed other weather infoboxes for other cities have a gradient of colors, depending upon the temperature. For instance, London's climate section includes this. I think this adds a nice visual touch to correspond with the varying temperatures. What does anyone think? —Un sogno modesto 01:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

RE: Add colours

We totally agree with Un sogno modesto.

Me and another user have put colours on many weatherboxes in the UK and South Africa, such as Template:Weymouth weatherbox, Template:Cape Town weatherbox, Template:Port Elizabeth weatherbox, Template:Durban weatherbox, Template:Johannesburg weatherbox, Template:Wye weatherbox. We have made a reference table for the colours for variables such as Temperature, Rainfall, Sunshine hours and Rainy days to refer to for consistency between weatherboxes so climate comparisons are easy. We think that this table with these (or very similar) colours should be used in weatherboxes, because there's no point in having a coloured table if the colours don't mean anything! Bennelliott • Talk • Contribs and Rossenglish 15:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Here's the reference table with the colours shown. Bennelliott • Talk • Contribs
Could the color be automatically chosen by the template depending on what temperature or amount of precip in entered? —MJCdetroit 17:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
We were thinking about that, it is possible. There are so many variables, it would be very time consuming. I'll have a think about how it could be done, and get back to you. Bennelliott • Talk • Contribs 18:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
I would if I knew how, but I don't know about the {{#if}}s and {{#but}}s of the syntax. Bennelliott • Talk • Contribs 20:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
My concern would be that the way you have the test templates set up makes it very difficult and tedious to edit the information in the future. For instance, with Cape Town, if one of you installed the box perfectly, what's to say a year from now someone updates the box with new information but doesn't change the colors. The colors then are pointless. The point of a template should be to make it easier for the average Joe editor to edit to and to provide a consistent look from page to page. If the color could somehow be automatic, I'd be ok with such a change.
I came across Toronto's weather box and I thought that looked sharp. I like the collapsibility of it. —MJCdetroit 04:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, it does look good. There's the same problem with the Toronto weatherbox though; the syntax is almost identical - just different colours - and more rows for info. It would be good if we create "Template:Weatherbox" with the table format and all the {{#if}}s etc. Problem is, each box with a value in it would have to have all the representative colour parameters for every single temperature / rainfall/ etc., unless theres a way of only having to define all the variables once and have each cell refer back to that. I don't know about the wiki formulae all that much. Bennelliott • Talk • Contribs
It's easy enough in Microsoft Excel rofl! Maybe we should consult a wiki formula expert to see someone would give it a go? Unless of course you are MJCdetroit? Bennelliott • Talk • Contribs
I'm a chemist, not a computer programmer. It would take a lot of trial and error for me. My thinking would be that using #switch might work. It's just piecing it all together. I'll ask over at the infobox project. —MJCdetroit 17:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
How about this: User:Doron/test5? It's not ready yet, though.--Doron 19:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
That's exactly what we're looking for! You are brilliant! Now, to get it into the mainspace templates... shall we try it out? We could make User:Doron/test5 into the main weatherbox template, and then perhaps User:Doron/test and User:Doron/test3 into subpages of that template?

Bennelliott • Talk • Contribs 19:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Well, I'd like to work on it for another day or so to clean up the code and add colors for precipitation, if that's OK. By the way, we only need test (as the weatherbox) and test3 (as a subpage), test5 is just a demonstration.--Doron 20:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Gathered that it wasn't finished, just had a quick glance through. Take as long as you want matey, no rush, it's your project :) Bennelliott • Talk • Contribs 20:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Test the code a few different ways for a few day then let's swap the code! I did a few tests and everything looks great. Again, nice work and fast, Doron.—MJCdetroit 02:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Hmm.. I was looking at the tests, I'm not sure about the black for uber high rainfall (and for the "year" rainfall). What does everyone else think? This is what I mean

Weather averages for Beijing, China
Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year
Average high °C (°F) 1 (34) 3 (38) 11 (52) 19 (67) 25 (78) 29 (85) 30 (86) 29 (85) 25 (78) 18 (66) 9 (49) 2 (37) 17 (63)
Average low °C (°F) -8 (17) -5 (22) 0 (33) 8 (47) 13 (57) 18 (66) 22 (72) 20 (69) 15 (59) 8 (47) 0 (32) -5 (22) 7 (45)
Precipitation cm (inches) 0 (0.2) 0 (0.2) 0 (0.3) 1 (0.7) 3 (1.3) 7 (3.1) 22 (8.8) 17 (6.7) 5 (2.3) 1 (0.7) 1 (0.4) 0 (0.1) 108 (25.1)
Source: Weatherbase[1] Feb 2007

Bennelliott • Talk • Contribs 12:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Dark grey would be fine, but I'm a little indifferent. —MJCdetroit 13:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
I do not like the black either - it stands out too much - dark navy or grey should be the limit. Rossenglish 14:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
What I meant by the year bit is that it should just be white bg, because it is always going to be a high number, not relative to each month. Bennelliott • Talk • Contribs 16:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I have slightly altered the colours to make their hex values more mathematically perfect, which solves the problem above of having black at the high end of the scale. (We did skip #0000DC because it was too similar to #0000FF)Bennelliott • Talk • Contribs 17:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Just an update: I've run into some minor difficulty which may be related to a bug in the wiki parser. It is very obscure and can be avoided, but I'd still like to do some more testing before releasing the code. I see you're already assessing the new design. I was also concerned about the colors, I agree with both points you brought up above -- I'll update the color scheme for precipitation and remove the color from the year column. An alternative could be to set the yearly precipitation by dividing the value by 12 -- which would produce a meaningful color for this column.--Doron 09:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

"An alternative could be to set the yearly precipitation by dividing the value by 12" - Another brilliant idea Doron! It would then mean something, along with the "year" for highest temperature, lowest temperature etc. Bennelliott • Talk • Contribs 12:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
With Doron making awesome progress on the color stuff, I thought I would go ahead and install dual Automatic Unit Conversion on his Doran/test code (but in my sandbox). This will make it so that a person can enter only metric values, or only imperial values and the entered values' counterpart will get converted and displayed. A person can still enter both metric and imperial values which would override the AUC. So far it works pretty well but I am only about halfway done (my real job keeps getting in the way...lol). This will make it a much more functional and user friendly template.—MJCdetroit 17:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

I overcame some difficulties with the new colored infobox, and I think it's ready. Before proceeding to replace the existing infobox, I'd still like some comments from you guys. I still haven't incorporated the automatic unit conversion, though, this will come next. Below are a couple more extreme examples taken directly from their respective articles:

Weather averages for Nord, Greenland
Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year
Average high °C -27 -26 -27 -18 -2 -3.4 6 4 -6 --- -22 -24 -13
Average low °C -32 -32 -33 -23 -12 -1 1 1 -10 -21 -27 -29 -18
Precipitation cm n/a
Average high °F -17 -16 -18 -1 20 36 43 40 20 --- -8 -12 8
Average low °F -27 -26 -29 -11 10 29 35 33 13 -7 -18 -21 -1.6
Precipitation inches n/a
Source: Weather.com[2] 1 Jan 2007
Weather averages for Kuala Lumpur
Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year
Record high °C 35 36 37 36 35 36 36 36 35 36 35 34 --
Average high °C 31.9 32.8 33.1 33.0 32.8 32.5 32.1 32.2 31.9 31.8 31.4 31.5 32.3
Average low °C 22.1 22.3 22.8 23.4 23.1 22.1 22.7 22.7 22.7 22.9 22.9 22.5 22.7
Record low °C 19 21 20 21 22 20 19 19 20 21 21 19 --
Precipitation mm 163 145 218 285 184 127 129 146 192 272 275 230 2,266
Record high °F 95 96.8 98.6 96.8 95.0 96.8 96.8 96.8 95.0 96.8 95.0 93.2 --
Average high °F 89.4 91.0 91.6 91.4 91.6 90.5 89.8 90.0 89.4 89.2 88.5 88.7 90.0
Average low °F 71.8 72.1 73.0 74.1 73.6 71.8 72.9 72.9 72.9 73.2 73.2 72.5 72.8
Record low °F 66.2 69.8 68 69.8 71.6 68 66.2 66.2 68 69.8 69.8 66.2 --
Precipitation inches 6.4 5.7 8.6 11.2 7.2 5.0 5.1 5.7 7.6 10.7 10.8 9.1 93.1
Source: National Environment Agency, Singapore [3] Jan 2007

Personally, I find these colors a bit strong. Check out the color schemes at Template:Infobox Weather/colp and Template:Infobox Weather/colt.--Doron 14:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps it would look better if the minus temperature range was extended with more blues from the Template:Infobox Weather/colp; at the moment the steps are every three degrees below zero, and skip one or two hex values in order of Template:Infobox Weather/colp. Maybe that'll sort it out for the more extreme examples, but that's the problem, extremes are rare, so the wider the range is stretched, the subtler the colour changes when it only varies by a degree or so. Bennelliott • Talk • Contribs 16:00, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Looks good but perhaps the precip colors could be a color other than blue, but admittedly I don't have any suggestions. I'll sleep on it (it's almost midnight) and maybe I'll have a suggestion tomorrow. zzzzzz—MJCdetroit 03:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

New weatherbox

Finally got around to finish the new weatherbox, sorry about the long delay. I think I'm done, it is currently invoked by {{Infobox Weather/new}}, and eventually would be copied into the main template. The template introduces two new features:

  • background color of table cells according to displayed value
  • automatic unit translation (imperial <=> metric) when data is specified in only one unit

I'd appreciate it if some of you could take the time to test it with various localities. One thing to look out for is that all fields must be given as numbers, no "n/a", no "---" and no numbers with commas, such as "2,257". The latter should be given as "2257", and if it represents annual precipitation, it would be displayed by the template as "2,257" (other fields are not likely to reach the thousands). If there are no objections, I'll copy the code from the temporary location into the main template in a few days.--Doron 07:39, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

At first, I was going to say that, I couldn't get the automatic unit translation to work:
imperial-->metric (metric not displaying)
Weather averages for Detroit, Michigan
Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year
Average high °F 31 33 44 58 70 79 83 81 74 62 48 35 58
Average low °F 16 18 27 37 48 57 62 60 53 41 32 22 39
Precipitation inches 1.9 1.7 2.4 3.0 2.9 3.6 3.1 3.4 2.8 2.2 2.7 2.5 32.3
Average high °C
Average low °C
Precipitation mm 48.3 43.2 61 76.2 73.7 91.4 78.7 86.4 71.1 55.9 68.6 63.5 820.4
Source: Weatherbase[1] Nov 2006


metric --->imperial (imperial not displaying)
Weather averages for Detroit, Michigan
Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year
Average high °C (°F) -1 1 6 14 21 26 28 27 23 16 8 1 14
Average low °C (°F) -8 -7 -2 2 8 13 16 15 11 5 0 -5 3
Precipitation mm (inches) 4 4 6 7 7 9 7 8 7 5 6 6 82
Source: Weatherbase[1] Nov 2006


However, I found that in order for conversion to work, one can not even have the opposing systems parameters left in the syntax. Here's with the °F parameters completely taken out of the syntax and the conversion works and I left the inch parameters in the syntax to show how that doesn't work.
<center><!--Infobox begins-->{{Infobox Weather/new
|metric_first=yes
|single_line=yes
|location = Detroit, Michigan
        |Jan_Hi_°C = -1
 |Feb_Hi_°C =  1
  |Mar_Hi_°C =  6       
 |Apr_Hi_°C = 14
 |May_Hi_°C = 21
  |Jun_Hi_°C = 26
  |Jul_Hi_°C = 28
 |Aug_Hi_°C = 27
 |Sep_Hi_°C = 23
  |Oct_Hi_°C = 16
 |Nov_Hi_°C = 8
 |Dec_Hi_°C = 1
 |Year_Hi_°C = 14
        |Jan_Lo_°C = -8
  |Feb_Lo_°C = -7
  |Mar_Lo_°C = -2
  |Apr_Lo_°C = 2
 |May_Lo_°C = 8
 |Jun_Lo_°C = 13
 |Jul_Lo_°C = 16
 |Aug_Lo_°C = 15
  |Sep_Lo_°C = 11
 |Oct_Lo_°C = 5
  |Nov_Lo_°C = 0
 |Dec_Lo_°C = -5
 |Year_Lo_°C = 3
|Jan_Precip_inch =  |Jan_Precip_mm = 4           
|Feb_Precip_inch =  |Feb_Precip_mm = 4
|Mar_Precip_inch =  |Mar_Precip_mm = 6
|Apr_Precip_inch =  |Apr_Precip_mm = 7
|May_Precip_inch = |May_Precip_mm = 7
|Jun_Precip_inch =  |Jun_Precip_mm = 9
|Jul_Precip_inch =  |Jul_Precip_mm = 7
|Aug_Precip_inch = |Aug_Precip_mm = 8
|Sep_Precip_inch =  |Sep_Precip_mm = 7
|Oct_Precip_inch =  |Oct_Precip_mm = 5
|Nov_Precip_inch =  |Nov_Precip_mm = 6
|Dec_Precip_inch =  |Dec_Precip_mm = 6
|Year_Precip_inch =  |Year_Precip_mm = 82
|source =Weatherbase<ref name=Weatherbase>{{cite web
| url =http://www.weatherbase.com/weather/weather.php3?s=073527&refer= | title =Weatherbase: Historical Weather for Detroit, Michigan, United States of America |accessmonthday = Nov 6 |accessyear = 2006 | language = English }}</ref>
|accessdate = Nov 2006
}}<!--Infobox ends--></center>
Weather averages for Detroit, Michigan
Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year
Average high °C (°F) -1 (30) 1 (34) 6 (43) 14 (57) 21 (70) 26 (79) 28 (82) 27 (81) 23 (73) 16 (61) 8 (46) 1 (34) 14 (57)
Average low °C (°F) -8 (18) -7 (19) -2 (28) 2 (36) 8 (46) 13 (55) 16 (61) 15 (59) 11 (52) 5 (41) 0 (32) -5 (23) 3 (37)
Precipitation mm (inches) 4 4 6 7 7 9 7 8 7 5 6 6 82
Source: Weatherbase[1] Nov 2006


If this is not a bug and it is to stay as such then we'll have to have 3 sets of empty syntaxes.
It looks as if in this occurrence that the conversion from imperial to metric has a typo. The table displays cm and the values are actually millimeters
<center>
<!--Infobox begins-->{{Infobox Weather/new
|metric_first= Yes
|single_line= 
|location = Kuala Lumpur
|Jan_Hi_°F = 89.4      |Jan_REC_Hi_°F =95    |Jan_REC_Lo_°F= 66.2
|Feb_Hi_°F = 91.0       |Feb_REC_Hi_°F =96.8  |Feb_REC_Lo_°F =69.8
|Mar_Hi_°F = 91.6       |Mar_REC_Hi_°F =98.6 |Mar_REC_Lo_°F = 68
|Apr_Hi_°F = 91.4       |Apr_REC_Hi_°F =96.8  |Apr_REC_Lo_°F = 69.8
|May_Hi_°F = 91.6      |May_REC_Hi_°F =95.0   |May_REC_Lo_°F =71.6
|Jun_Hi_°F = 90.5       |Jun_REC_Hi_°F =96.8  |Jun_REC_Lo_°F =68
|Jul_Hi_°F = 89.8       |Jul_REC_Hi_°F = 96.8  |Jul_REC_Lo_°F =66.2
|Aug_Hi_°F = 90.0     |Aug_REC_Hi_°F =96.8    |Aug_REC_Lo_°F =66.2
|Sep_Hi_°F = 89.4     |Sep_REC_Hi_°F =95.0    |Sep_REC_Lo_°F =68
|Oct_Hi_°F = 89.2     |Oct_REC_Hi_°F =96.8   |Oct_REC_Lo_°F =69.8
|Nov_Hi_°F = 88.5       |Nov_REC_Hi_°F =95.0  |Nov_REC_Lo_°F =69.8
|Dec_Hi_°F = 88.7        |Dec_REC_Hi_°F =93.2  |Dec_REC_Lo_°F =66.2
|Year_Hi_°F = 90.0      |Year_REC_Hi_°F =   |Year_REC_Lo_°F =

|Jan_Lo_°F =71.8     
|Feb_Lo_°F =72.1     
|Mar_Lo_°F =73.0    
|Apr_Lo_°F =74.1    
|May_Lo_°F =73.6     
|Jun_Lo_°F =71.8     
|Jul_Lo_°F =72.9      
|Aug_Lo_°F =72.9     
|Sep_Lo_°F =72.9      
|Oct_Lo_°F =73.2      
|Nov_Lo_°F =73.2      
|Dec_Lo_°F =72.5      
|Year_Lo_°F =72.8    

|Jan_Precip_inch = 6.4
|Feb_Precip_inch = 5.7
|Mar_Precip_inch = 8.6
|Apr_Precip_inch = 11.2
|May_Precip_inch = 7.2
|Jun_Precip_inch =5.0
|Jul_Precip_inch =5.1
|Aug_Precip_inch =5.7
|Sep_Precip_inch =7.6
|Oct_Precip_inch =10.7
|Nov_Precip_inch =10.8
|Dec_Precip_inch =9.1
|Year_Precip_inch =93.1

|source =National Environment Agency, Singapore <ref name=Nat_Enviro >{{cite web
| url =http://app.nea.gov.sg/cms/htdocs/article.asp?pid=1106#klclimo | title =THE CLIMATE OF MALAYSIA | accessmonthday =Jan 12 | accessyear = 2007 
| publisher = | language =English }}</ref>
|accessdate = Jan 2007
|source2 =
|accessdate2 = 
}}<!--Infobox ends-->
</center>
Weather averages for Kuala Lumpur
Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year
Record high °C 35 36 37 36 35 36 36 36 35 36 35 34
Average high °C 32 33 33 33 33 33 32 32 32 32 31 32 32
Average low °C 22 22 23 23 23 22 23 23 23 23 23 23 23
Record low °C 19 21 20 21 22 20 19 19 20 21 21 19
Precipitation mm 162.6 144.8 218.4 284.5 182.9 127 129.5 144.8 193 271.8 274.3 231.1 2,364.7
Record high °F 95 96.8 98.6 96.8 95.0 96.8 96.8 96.8 95.0 96.8 95.0 93.2
Average high °F 89.4 91.0 91.6 91.4 91.6 90.5 89.8 90.0 89.4 89.2 88.5 88.7 90.0
Average low °F 71.8 72.1 73.0 74.1 73.6 71.8 72.9 72.9 72.9 73.2 73.2 72.5 72.8
Record low °F 66.2 69.8 68 69.8 71.6 68 66.2 66.2 68 69.8 69.8 66.2
Precipitation inches 6.4 5.7 8.6 11.2 7.2 5.0 5.1 5.7 7.6 10.7 10.8 9.1 93.1
Source: National Environment Agency, Singapore [3] Jan 2007


I only experimented with the new infobox for a few minutes. Other than the one quirk (which we can live with) and the one typo, I think we have an excellent infobox. —MJCdetroit 12:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Fixed the typo bug. As for your other concern, it can be solved, but it would make the code even more unreadable than it already is (too many features in this template for such a primitive programming language!). Do you think it's worth the trouble?--Doron 23:15, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Like I said, we can live with it as long as we make an effort to let folks know about it and supply three different empty syntaxes (Imperial, Metric, and both). That should cover all the bases. I say—GO LIVE!. —MJCdetroit 05:57, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Nice job on the template, wish I'd known about it earlier. Heh. Quick question though, why is it necessary to have fields for Metric and Imperial? Seems to be opening us up to stupid math errors (of which I make many). Why not just eliminate the reference to units in the fields and use the Metric_first field to determine if the values in the fields are metric or imperial, and add a "Metric_in_CM" field to determine which metric unit? --Bobblehead (rants) 22:09, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Two reasons: (a) backward compatibility; (b) sometimes an editor might want to enter both (e.g., because of rounding), while one can always choose to enter just one of them (to avoid errors).--Doron 00:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
There are less than a hundred articles in which this template is used so it should be rather easy and quick to convert to the new template, so I'm not sure how much of a hurdle backward compatibility is. But good point on the rounding, the auto-convert doesn't seem to maintain rounding. --Bobblehead (rants) 00:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

As we started above ages ago in "RE: Add colours" - what a good idea this turned out to be. Well done Bennelliott • Talk • Contribs and Rossenglish 15:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

I added an imperial only and a metric only empty syntaxes to speed up editing. I implemented it on the Johannesburg article. —MJCdetroit 16:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, if there are no objections, I'd like to archive the color discussion above, since it clutters this talk page and makes it slow...--Doron 14:55, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

More than agree, sections 7, 9 and 12. Bennelliott • Talk • Contribs 15:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)