Template talk:Infobox EastEnders character 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] More family fields
Shall we add more fields here? They have been quite thorough on the Us soap infobox Template:Infobox soap character Gungadin♦ 18:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Also what are your thoughts about including more image fields for recasts? They have done this in the Us infobox too, they seem to have 3 options, see here for example Babe Carey.Gungadin♦ 18:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- I don't really mind if you add more family and image fields. I also don't really mind if you don't. Might as well do it then... lol — AnemoneProjectors (会話) 19:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- LOL, I appreciate your thoroughness, but don't you think "great great grandchildren" and "2nd cousin four" is overkill? I don't even think someone's second cousin four times removed should be mentioned in their infobox at all, that's like listing "guy that lives in the same town." Just my 2 cents. ;) — TAnthonyTalk 06:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- lol, that's very true. The recent additions of all those fields is just a compromise, so that we can keep the family lists off the bottom of the character pages (they kept being reinstated). I dont mind how thorough people are with it as long as it stops all the reverting and edit-warring :) Gungadin 11:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- It gets rid of the family sections people seem to hate, but keeps the information in a hiddne bit of the infobox - the fields are all optional, and have only been added if they are needed for certain characters. (See Nellie Ellis). I don't see what the problem is. It's a compromise, thorough and optional. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 17:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Fix needed
There's a stray {{#if: | on here somewhere, which is showing up on all the infobox 2s. I cant spot it, can u see it? Gungadin 22:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- I've done it but it got rid of "other relatives" cos I copied it form Ibox 3 - but we dont need "other relatives" anyway. The documentation needs sorting out, and I don't understand it... -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 22:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 3rd image and caption
Shall we add a 3rd image box. They have 3 image fields in the US soap infobox. Will be good for characters like Jnaine and Liam Butcher.Gungadin 16:23, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- I think Janine's and Peter's look fine at the moment - I think another section will look too big. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 16:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Or we could try to have it so it goes:
- Or we could try to have it so it goes:
-
-
Image
Caption
Image
Caption
to break up the pictures, because at the moment it's:
Image
Image
Caption
Caption -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 17:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- I dont think I'd be keen on collapsible, cos I like having the original actors constantly visible. let's try the "br" thing, that might work. We should probably change the title to "alternative image(s)" tooGungadin 17:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] New Fields?
What do you think about adding a gender and sexuality field to the infobox? Gungadin 18:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- That it's pointless, and that it would give vandals a field day to add |gender=girl to Ben Mitchell or |sexuality=Gay!!!! to Phil Mitchell etc. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 18:10, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
I don't think we should get rid of the status field. We've changed enough on the infoboxes as it is! :) We need at least ONE constant
Conquistado2k6 01:07 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Fair enough, it can stay if you like it. Putting "in a relationship with blah blah" does bug me though. Dating is not a marital status is it? They are either single or married. someone who is dating is legally single. Ive been seeing my boyfriend for years, but I still fill out single in forms. Just a personal gripe I have. Trampikey has a point too, deceased isnt a marital status either.Gungadin 00:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC)