Template talk:Infobox Archbishop of Canterbury
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines. |
| Template | This article has been rated as Template-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
[edit] Enthroned or consecrated
When does the archbishop "begin", when he is enthroned or when he is consecrated? In Thomas Cranmer's case this happened on two different dates. --RelHistBuff (talk) 16:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- I believe you have been misinformed and dont actully understand what you have just said. Enthronement and Conscretion are different things and you dont even mention conscretion in your message althought that is the name you have given it. Do some more research and then try to ask your question again. Electrobe (talk) 18:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
The question was quite clear to me. What didn't you get? -- Secisek (talk) 08:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- An archbishop begins his time as archbishop when he is consecrated. I don't mind having an enthroned field also, but it really needs our old form back. I'm now running into issues with GA and PR reviews where folks are questioning things because the box got changed out from under me. Is it going to stay stable, so if I go through and change all my parameters I won't have to go through and do it again later? Ealdgyth - Talk 19:39, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Why don't we just restore the old box? The change took place because someone felt that "Enthroned" was more elegant than "began" but did not take into account that what they did created errors. I put off making the changes you requested long enough. What do you want here? I will make it so. -- Secisek (talk) 20:25, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, I really like the form the new Archbishop of York box took. I put in a Consecrated field, and it works perfect. It's elegant, collapses anything we don't have a field for, and isn't quite so magenta. And thanks, Secisek, for putting up with a grumpy ABC editor. Ealdgyth - Talk 20:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
So you want me to move set this one exatly the same? Say the word... -- Secisek (talk) 20:38, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
You deal with them more than anybody else. Fine with me. I'll do it right now. Any other fields required? -- Secisek (talk) 20:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Not really that I can think of. The nice thing about the newer version is that I can understand and add fields on that template. Ealdgyth - Talk 20:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
YEAH! -- Secisek (talk) 21:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Portal template
I don't think the Portal template should be included in this template. I might not look great on all pages, and currently you don't have control over its position. It would be better if you separate it and add it individually . Eklipse (talk) 18:32, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
