Talk:Infornography

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Medicine This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the doctor's mess.
Stub This page has been rated as stub-Class on the quality assessment scale
??? This page has not yet received a rating on the importance assessment scale.

This could be expanded more and I've even provided some references you can use if you get to this before I do. Wired also has a section called Infoporn. I wouldn't object to a rename to Information addiction though, even given that I am fond of the term from Lain. Kotepho 22:48, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

I so-did-it. Revert if problematical. Hpuppet - «Talk» 14:44, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Much of the article's text (starting from September 13th, 2005) was plagiarized (see the Internet Archive for verification: http://web.archive.org/web/20010405093618/http://www.cjas.org/~leng/lain.htm ), so I kept the basic info, quoted it properly, and linked back to the original source.

[edit] Wikipediholic??

there is a see also Wikipediholic but no such subject exists, what then is the point of a see also? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.24.195.253 (talk • contribs)

[edit] Redirect

People searching for Wikipediholic are most likely looking for WP:HOLIC itself without realising that it is in the Wikipedia namespace, requiring a prefix. So why does Wikipediholic redirect here? Littleghostboo[ talk ] 01:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)

Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.

Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 03:29, 7 February 2007 (UTC)