Talk:Information professional

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Editors ought not remove information that's useful, regardless of whether the source is a company. If it's a one-resource-list, make it a two- or three-resource-list instead. Factiva is a legitimate resource for Information Professionals. I, for one, would like to see what contribution they have to offer. Unsigned comments added by anonymous User:70.19.84.92

[edit] Resources for information professionals

This may be useful, but it's a one-resource-list that serves as a spamvertisement for Factiva. It's "funny" how the SLA information quickly devolves into another spamvertisement for Factiva. If you check out the spammer's contributions to Wikipedia, they all involve posting Factiva spam in different articles. Rklawton 15:51, 5 May 2006 (UTC)