Talk:Informal logic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

Philosophy Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale. Additional information: Related task forces (core areas): Logic Mathematics Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, which collaborates on articles related to mathematics. Mathematics rating: Start Class Mid Priority  Field: Foundations, logic, and set theory Please update this rating as the article progresses, or if the rating is inaccurate. Click to show/hide comments. Please add to or update the comments to suggest improvements to the article. Geometry guy 22:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You can't prove anything using only informal logic

It seems to me that you can't prove anything using only informal logic, but I may be wrong. Doesn't it take an appeal to formal logic to prove informal logic's statements? I'll look for references later if I have time. Jules LT 22:12, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sections don't mention logic

The two sections, Social sciences and Law and politics don't mention logic at all. It felt to me as they somehow aren't quite connected to the article. __meco 08:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Serious?

Is this article serious, or a spoof? 84.9.92.9 (talk) 21:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)