Talk:Indigo children/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rated article as Start-class. Rationalization follows. -Wooty Woot? contribs 03:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Strengths

• Article is relatively well referenced.
• POV is not a large issue here - the article is well balanced. Articles on pseudoscientific phenomenons are usually not this well balanced, which is nice.
• Lead section is relatively well done and presents the article's subject well for a general audience
• External links section is free of spam and balanced

[edit] Weaknesses

• Some references are incorrectly done - for example, using external links rather than reference tags.
• Adding to the point above, some news articles that could be used as sources are simply linked to in the external links section, and news articles that ARE used as sources are not correctly referenced.
• The article seems sort of clunky. I have done some reorganization.

• No images to be found.
• May have WP:MOS issues.
• Some sentence structures are unclear, needs a general copyedit.