Talk:Indian cricket team in Australia in 2007-08
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Flags for Tour Matches
Seeing as how this page is now protected (doubtlessly because the controversy surrounding the 2nd Test and the tour in generally) unregistered users cannot contribute. I would like to suggest that as the ACT Invitational XI Tour match now has the ACT flag, then the Victoria tour match should have the Victoria flag: 72.27.162.248 (talk) 20:16, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Is that okay now? Ansell 20:38, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- Cool, the lack of a flag seemed odd since in every other article flags are used to represent the teams (when a flag exists to represent them that is). Any idea on when the article might become unprotected?72.27.57.42 (talk) 01:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- May be after the Test Series is over. Err!... Sreesanth may be on his way to Australia for the Twenty20 and CB Series. May be a week or so after the CB Series is over, I presume.167.131.0.194 (talk) 19:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
-
[edit] Indian Team for Twenty20
The Indian team is declared for the Twenty20. Since the page is going to be protected indefinitely, someone needs to update that. The CB Series Main Page is updated I guess since Indian and Sri Lankan teams are both there.167.131.0.194 (talk) 15:22, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Done.DesiStrider (talk) 22:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Umpiring Incidents
Should we put Rauf's mistakes also there, not sure if LBW's deserve much merit here considering others were really serious blunders. He missed two appeals (Sehwag and Dravid) in the fourth match before slightly balancing out by giving Ganguly out which may have been not out. Even in 3rd match he made some errors mostly LBW's. Speaking of third test, was that Billy who gave Symonds out on bat-pad or was it Rauf as well?DesiStrider (talk) 16:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- It was Billy.
- I would not put in Rauf's "mistakes" in this article, as they are hardly notable. The current umpiring incidents that are present in the article, are much notable and are the ones part of the controversy. - KNM Talk 17:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- That's what I was thinking - LBW's are probably fine otherwise every match would have a fair amount of "controversies". I saw some discussions on the Main Page of the Sydney Test about LBW's, so was not sure if they needed to be added here. DesiStrider (talk) 20:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)