Talk:India (porn star)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Assessment (and short review)
- No references at all, for someone as inherently controversial as a porn star, we absolutely need Wikipedia:Reliable source references. IMDB and IAFD don't count, as they're anonymous contribution databases, with minimal editorial control. Can't see marking higher than {{Start-Class}} without them, and, in fact, controversial entries could just get deleted without them. Is there a publicly available bio on her web site? That can be used.
- She appeared with some notable music stars, and put out a mainstream album, so the importance scale could go to {{Mid-importance}} if a reference shows that the greater world outside porn noticed.
- Filmography section is too long. Keep the first entry, and the Snoop Dogg ones that have articles, but other than those, just keep a few (half dozen, say) representative ones. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pornography#Filmographies --AnonEMouse (squeak) 17:45, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Problems
The article claims India to publish stuff via karadavis.com, as well as working for the moonlite bunny ranch. there seems to be absolutely no India material at karadavis.com. Is that sentence a cleverly disguised advertising ? Same goes for the brothel, though that web site is not too conclusive. If nobody offers some hints or sources I will remove that sentence Tullius2 22:26, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Categories: Biography articles with listas parameter | Biography articles of living people | Biography articles with comments | Wikipedia requested photographs of people | Start-Class biography articles | WikiProject Pornography articles | Start-Class Pornography articles | Low-importance Pornography articles | Start-Class Low-importance Pornography articles | Sex work task force articles | Start-Class Sex work articles | Unknown-importance Sex work articles | Sexology and sexuality articles with comments | Start-Class Sexuality articles | Unknown-importance Sexuality articles