User:Inclusionist/Bad
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Other admins have been desysopped for fewer Wikipedia:BLOCK#Disputes violations:
- Admin MONGO [1][2][1]
- Admin Physchim62 violated Wikipedia:BLOCK#Disputes once, and this was one of the two listed reasons he was unanimously dysopped: the block "contravenes blocking policy which prohibits blocks against parties in dispute with the blocking admin."[3]
- Admin Rama's Arrow, "he has vigorously dismissed and vitriolically lampooned criticism raised about blocking whilst in conflict." Passed 5-2.
- Admin Vanished user provisionally desysopped for six months (passed 7-2) user_provisionally_desysopped_for_six_months Requests for arbitration/Matthew_Hoffman: "Administrative tools may not be used to further the administrator's own position in a content dispute." (passed unanimously) "Vanished user repeatedly used his administrative tools against usual norms and policies, on articles and in disputes where he was personally involved. On several occasions he blocked or prevented editing by users with differing viewpoints, furthering his own position in the dispute" (passed unanimously)
- Admin R. fiend stepped down as admin after complaints abuse of the same Administrative tools Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/R. fiend
- Admin Darwinek The main reason Admin Darwinek was desyssoped was he "displayed a pattern of poor judgment in performing administrative actions, including blocking users...with whom he was engaged in a dispute" [4]
- Admin Alkivar One of the reasons Admin Alkivar was desysopped was for blocking a user he was edit warring with once. [5]
- Admin Alkivar desysopped. "Philwelch, by blocking and threatening to block users whom he was currently engaged in disputes with, misused his administrative powers." (passed unanimously)
The arbitration committee has also repeatedly reminded admins that they can be desysopped and punished for Wikipedia:BLOCK#Disputes violations:
- Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar 2: "Administrators who are parties to this case are reminded that they should find an uninvolved admin to determine if blocks or other actions against any other parties to the case are appropriate, and should under no circumstances take such actions themselves...Any party that violates the ban on admin actions imposed in this case will be summarily desysopped " (Unanimous decision).
- Wikipedia:Requests for_arbitration/InShaneee "Inshaneee blocked the user, contrary to the blocking policy which forbids the use of blocking to gain the upper hand in a dispute." (passed unanimously, 11-0) "InShaneee's admin privileges are suspended for a period of ten days." (passed, 8-3)