Inchoate offense
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
| Criminal law |
|---|
| Part of the common law series |
| Criminal elements |
| Actus reus · Causation · Concurrence |
| Mens rea · Intention · Recklessness |
| Criminal negligence · Ignorantia juris… |
| Strict, Corporate & Vicarious liability |
| Crimes against people |
| Assault · Battery · Robbery |
| Sexual offences · Pimping · Rape |
| Kidnapping · Manslaughter · Murder |
| Crimes against property |
| Property damage · Arson |
| Theft · Burglary · Deception |
| Crimes against justice |
| Obstruction of justice · Bribery |
| Perjury · Malfeasance in office |
| Inchoate offenses |
| Attempt |
| Conspiracy · Accessory |
| Criminal defenses |
| Automatism, Intoxication & Mistake |
| Insanity · Diminished responsibility |
| Duress · Necessity |
| Provocation · Self defence |
| Other areas of the common law |
| Contract law · Tort law · Property law |
| Wills and trusts · Evidence |
| Portals: Law · Criminal justice |
An inchoate offence (British English) or inchoate offense (American English) is the crime of preparing for or seeking to commit another crime. The most common example of an inchoate offence is conspiracy. Inchoate offence has been defined as "Conduct deemed criminal without actual harm being done, provided that the harm that would have occurred is one the law tries to prevent."[1] It is a "crime about crime."[citation needed] This term is also called an inchoate crime.[citation needed]
Contents |
[edit] Intent
Every inchoate crime or offense must have the mens rea of intent.[citation needed] Absent a specific law, an inchoate offence requires that the defendant have the specific intent to commit the underlying crime. For example, for a defendant to be guilty of the inchoate crime of solicitation of murder, he or she must actually intend for that person to die.[citation needed]
Intent may be distinguished from Recklessness and Criminal negligence as a higher mens rea.
[edit] Proof of intent
Specific intent may be inferred from circumstances.[citation needed][2] It may be proven by the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur or "dangerous proximity".[citation needed]
[edit] Merger doctrine
A true inchoate offence occurs when the intended crime is not perpetrated since the Doctrine of Merger prohibits charging both, except for conspiracy.
[edit] Linguistics
 |
Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. (April 2008) |
 |
This section does not cite any references or sources. (April 2008) Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. |
Definitions of inchoate offenses often include unusual liguistic constructions.
[edit] Cognate accusative
[edit] Imperative case
[edit] Other
[edit] Failure
|
|
This section does not cite any references or sources. (April 2008) Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. |
There can be various causes of failing the commission of the underlying crime, for example arrest prior to committing the crime, accident which prevents the crime, or even factual impossibility.[citation needed] For example, the defendant takes a gun that he believes is loaded, points it at the victim, and with the intent to kill the victim, pulls the trigger. The gun is not loaded, however, and the victim runs away. In this case, the defendant would be guilty of the inchoate crime of attempted murder, even though it was actually impossible for the defendant to commit the underlying crime, murder.
[edit] Defenses
There are a number of possible defenses to the charge of an inchoate offense, depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the offense.
[edit] Impossibility
If the underlying crime to be attempted could not have been performed, then a defense to the charge would be that it would be impossible to commit the crime. If a man is hired to commit murder, but before he can get to the victim, the victim drops dead of a heart attack, the murder would have been impossible. If a group of men go to rob a liquor store, and arriving at the (attempted) crime scene, find the building in flames, then again, the crime would have been impossible.
Also, if it would have been impossible for the alleged perpetrator to have committed the crime, that may also be a defense. If a man with no arms is arrested for attempting to beat a man to death with a baseball bat, proof that there is no way he could have lifted or used a baseball bat would be a defense of impossibility.
It should be noted, however, that such impossibility, in the realistic sense, may not be a legal defense under state laws. In Oregon, for example, it is not.[3] Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 161.425 states: "Impossibility not a defense. In a prosecution for an attempt, it is no defense that it was impossible to commit the crime which was the object of the attempt where the conduct engaged in by the actor would be a crime if the circumstances were as the actor believed them to be."[3] The group of adventurous perpetrators arriving at the burning liquor store could therefore still be arrested in Oregon for "attempted robbery" of the burning store.[citation needed]
Other cases that illustrate the case law for impossibility defenses are People v. Lee Kong (1892), State v. Mitchell (1902) and United States v. Thomas (1962).[citation needed]
[edit] Abandonment
[edit] Examples
Examples of inchoate offences include conspiracy, solicitation, facilitation, misprision of felony, organized crime, and attempt, as well as some public health crimes; see the list below.[citation needed]
[edit] References
[edit] List of Inchoate offenses
- Accessory
- Attempt - See State v. Mitchell
- Conspiracy
- Facilitation
- Misprision of felony
- Misprision of treason
- RICO
- Solicitation
- Mail fraud
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
- O'Connor, T. (November 3, 2006). In Part of web cited (INCOMPLETE (INCHOATE) CRIMES), MegaLinks in Criminal Justice. Retrieved from April 2, 2008.
