Talk:In a Mirror, Darkly
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Two parter
This episode is a two parter, Production numbers 94 and 95. ("In a Mirror, Darkly" and "In a Mirror, Darkly, Part II") I'd make the change myself but it's been a good hour and my IP is still blocked (AOL.) - A.J. 22:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Correction
"Though, the differences are also nuanced in their commonality, such as the depiction of the V-2 rocket directly leading to a successful Moon landing. Yet, if there is a single "point of divergence" for the Mirror Universe, this is not it."
I edited this because the V2 is not shown in the mirror intro. We see a Saturn V rocket launch, and a shot of it flying overlaid over a blackboard (both scene appear in the normal intro), before a scene of a man in a Terran spacesuit placing a flag of the Terran Empire on the moon.
--80.43.55.233 12:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] how much of the text can you read?
lots of things are citing the history text in this episode. can someone confirm how much is actually shown on screen? i am worried that in some places we are directly citing the text that was writtten to be displayed on the screen, which may not have been actually seen, whilst claiming that it was on screen. Morwen - Talk 11:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Continuity Error
why is the continuity error information being deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.140.84 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 16 April 2007
- Because this is an encyclopedia article, not a fan critic site. If this information can't be backed up by a reliable source it's worthless to the article. It's also completely speculative, and reads like what it is: one fan's disappointment that more thought wasn't put into the episode's backstory. Memory Alpha is a better place for stuff like this. Chris Cunningham 22:41, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Addendum: I would like all references to a "racist" and humans only Federation eliminated from all Trek related entries because they refuse to acknowledge this one simple fact: Real world production. In the real 1960's Gene dimply didn't have the budget to portray all the alien creatures we (in 2007) are used to seeing.
What about the fact that the united human race is only ever represented by Americans and the odd Brit? Seems pretty racist to me. Don't need special effects to hire foreign actors, hollywood's full of them. Guess the rest of the world's not invited to the utopian future 59.38.32.5 (talk) 06:10, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:In a Mirror, Darkly (ENT episode) Part II.jpg
Image:In a Mirror, Darkly (ENT episode) Part II.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:In a Mirror, Darkly (ENT episode) Part I.jpg
Image:In a Mirror, Darkly (ENT episode) Part I.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)