Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2008 June 13
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] June 13
[edit] Image:Pierretrudeau.PNG
- - uploaded by Earl Andrew (notify | contribs).
- Copyvio per Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Library and Archives Canada non-PD images Rob (talk) 22:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Wolf_Armoured_Vehicle.jpg
- - uploaded by Dreamafter (notify | contribs).
- Israeli government images are not PD. -Nard 00:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:NI_coursing_leaflet.jpg
- - uploaded by MikeHobday (notify | contribs).
- Replaceable by free image of this activity per WP:NFCC#1. If the League Against Cruel Sports could obtain an image of this, so could we - or the LASC could release their image under free license. Kelly hi! 00:11, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Regrettably the image is not replaceable - the organisers of hare coursing events do not generally permit photography. The background to this image is this: that the League Against Cruel Sports purchased a commercial image with permission to use it on a leaflet. and then distributed the leaflet. They did not buy general use rights for the image and therefore cannot release the image. The leaflet they produced, however, is in the public domain. MikeHobday (talk) 07:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Genesis_80s.jpg
[edit] Image:Exclamblack.JPG
- - uploaded by RayquazaDialgaWeird2210 (notify | contribs).
- Unused, Unencyclopedic. -Nard 00:45, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Alkett_and_Rhinemetall-Borsig's_Heuschrecke_10.jpg
- - uploaded by Dreamafter (notify | contribs).
- Copyvio from http://www.achtungpanzer.com/wafft.htm -Nard 00:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Heuschrecke_10_rear_view.jpg
- - uploaded by Dreamafter (notify | contribs).
- Copyvio from http://www.williammaloney.com/Aviation/AberdeenUSArmyOrdinanceMuseum/GermanTanks/Heuschrecke/pages/02Heuschrecke.htm -Nard 01:00, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Badlands_Guardian.jpg
- I think this image is a copyvio. It has no source. -Nard 01:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Hydrohs_Avatar.gif
- Image is taken from software that is not under a free license. -Nard 01:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Literatness_Timeline.png
- Unencyclopedic. -Nard 01:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:El01m.jpg
[edit] Image:South_Park_Blizzard_executives.jpg
- Image is rationaled to "significantly to the article by illustrating an important point in the plot of the episode." The illustration of the three men at a table is not required to convey the information therein and does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic—"Make Love, Not Warcraft" (WP:NFCC#3a & #8). — pd_THOR | =/\= | 15:00, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:South_Park_WoW_computer_lab.jpg
- Image is rationaled to "[contribute] significantly to the article by illustrating an important point in the plot of the episode." The illustration of four overweight children in a computer lab is not required to convey the information already described therein and does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic—"Make Love, Not Warcraft" (WP:NFCC#3a & #8). — pd_THOR | =/\= | 15:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree --RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210 23:56, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I agree that this image makes no difference to the article. The characters' looks are well known. This image shows how WoW is supposed to have affected them. (1) they're all fat and pimply, (2) they're in a computer lab, not a place we'd expect them to frequent. - Denimadept (talk) 16:56, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'll acquiesce that I'm not familiar with South Park or its characters, except to recognize the main ones. While the image does illustrate the characters' adjusted appearances, is it sufficiently indescribable so as to require this copyrighted imagery? I lean towards doubting that. Further, the computer lab aspect you bring up is neither mentioned nor referenced in the article. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 17:18, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- It's not mentioned in the article directly, perhaps. See the second paragraph under "Plot". It's an illustration adding to the depth of what is described in the article, therefore it is adding to the article. I'd agree it was useless if the article itself covered that specific scene in excruciating detail, but the picture is simpler and more direct, which is the point of including an image. If Comedy Central and South Park Studios don't complain, I suggest leaving this alone, perhaps moving the image to the infobox to replace the one removed earlier. - Denimadept (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- But that's the crux of WP:NFCC#1: if something needs to be covered, but can be done with free content as opposed to non-free, then the non-free isn't used. The scene is already covered in a sufficient fashion textually, and doesn't need to use another's copyrighted material. In the grander scheme, I don't see how this image significantly contributes to the understanding of the article as a whole; it does nicely illustrate it, but that doesn't meet muster. Of course, FWIW, I'm just providing my input and interpretation here. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 18:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Understood, and no offense taken. I didn't include either screen shot, though I can understand why they're there. You'll note that I'm not defending the other one at all. I'm not sure the policy you reference applies since there can be no such free source for a screen shot from a recent episode of a program. If the program were out of copyright, that'd be different, of course. I suggest "fair use" works for a single screen shot unless challenged by the holder(s). - Denimadept (talk) 19:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- But that's the crux of WP:NFCC#1: if something needs to be covered, but can be done with free content as opposed to non-free, then the non-free isn't used. The scene is already covered in a sufficient fashion textually, and doesn't need to use another's copyrighted material. In the grander scheme, I don't see how this image significantly contributes to the understanding of the article as a whole; it does nicely illustrate it, but that doesn't meet muster. Of course, FWIW, I'm just providing my input and interpretation here. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 18:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- It's not mentioned in the article directly, perhaps. See the second paragraph under "Plot". It's an illustration adding to the depth of what is described in the article, therefore it is adding to the article. I'd agree it was useless if the article itself covered that specific scene in excruciating detail, but the picture is simpler and more direct, which is the point of including an image. If Comedy Central and South Park Studios don't complain, I suggest leaving this alone, perhaps moving the image to the infobox to replace the one removed earlier. - Denimadept (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'll acquiesce that I'm not familiar with South Park or its characters, except to recognize the main ones. While the image does illustrate the characters' adjusted appearances, is it sufficiently indescribable so as to require this copyrighted imagery? I lean towards doubting that. Further, the computer lab aspect you bring up is neither mentioned nor referenced in the article. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 17:18, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Thedemoneye.png
- - uploaded by thedemonhog (notify | contribs).
- This image was uploaded to give readers some idea of what I look like, but it has become redundant with the upload of Image:2008 Vancouver meetup.jpg. –thedemonhog talk • edits 21:13, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
