Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 November 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< November 12 November 14 >

Contents

[edit] November 13

[edit] Image:Rsz_schoolpicture.gif

Image:Rsz_schoolpicture.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rgmccoy04 (notify | contribs).

[edit] Image:Aknoxreduce.jpg

Image:Aknoxreduce.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cumulus Clouds (notify | contribs).

[edit] Image:Bips&John2007.jpg

Image:Bips&John2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by A 813p (notify | contribs).
  • Most likely a copyright violation. The original description attributed glamsham.com, and the low resolution of the image also indicates that it was not created by A 813p. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ai Otsuka.jpg

Image:Ai Otsuka.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Isida1028 (notify | contribs).
  • Fixing malformed IFD request. Original reason was "unlikely that contributor owns the picture; it is a mirror image of images available for sale elsewhere on the internet. Contributor has several recent pictures which are more-obviously copyvios which have been uploaded with the same PD-self license." -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete - Tagged as copyvio of image on official website --DAJF 05:20, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lifeofpi_diagram.gif

Image:Lifeofpi_diagram.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tredanse (notify | contribs).
  • Image is a clear diagram of the raft used by the protagonist in The Life of Pi. Unfortunately, the author assembled the diagram from selections of the book's 50th chapter, per his remarks on the image page, meaning that this image meets the criteria for original research. I don't know that it can be salvaged with such an blatant violation of that policy, but in the case that it can I will certainly withdraw this nomination. Cumulus Clouds 06:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  • I disagree. It would be a good candidate for the Commons in my opinion, but according to the very same policy : "Pictures have enjoyed a broad exception from this policy, in that Wikipedia editors are encouraged to take photographs or draw pictures or diagrams and upload them, releasing them under the GFDL or another free license, to illustrate articles. This is welcomed because images generally do not propose unpublished ideas or arguments, the core reason behind the NOR policy. "MarsInSVG (talk) 04:57, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  • I nominated this for deletion because I don't believe this picture falls within the exceptions in that policy. I don't think user interprations of a book's setting can be used in this article. It would be something like an editor inserting lines in the article that "the raft probably looked like this with the tiger like this and the tarp like this." Such a line would easily be recognized as OR and I believe this image is the same. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 19:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, per Cumulus Clouds' concerns. -- RG2 00:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, per MarsInSVG. ViperSnake151 13:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Good god, if that's high quality, then I'm Leonardo da Vinci. And not only does it look embarrassingly unprofessional, it's completely unnecessary too. Delete - ∅ (∅), 07:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Alice-Terry.jpg

Image:Alice-Terry.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by [[User talk:#Image:Alice-Terry.jpg listed for deletion|]] ([[[:Template:Fullurl:User talk:]] notify] | contribs).
  • 1924 publication, inexplicable CC assertion- 140.247.243.169 07:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Mrd.jpg

Image:Mrd.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sharkshoooter (notify | contribs).
Are you saying you beleive this image to be part of an attack on the page for kinross, wa?

and as for privacy issues, you may email him and ask if you would like, antmark_5@hotmail.com, tell him Tim has used the image he took in class im sure he wont mind. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharkshoooter (talk • contribs) 10:57, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes. The section about the teacher in the article was completely irrelevant and violated Wikipedia's WP:BLP policy. And because the image has no useful purpose on Wikipedia, it should be deleted. ~Matticus TC 11:11, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  • It was orphaned when I checked a few days ago, and it's still orphaned now, so delete. -- RG2 00:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Gabsclub.jpg

Image:Gabsclub.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Unholysmoke (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, UE OsamaK 11:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:EX3CUT.jpg

Image:EX3CUT.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gbrown@xmn.com (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, used on deleted page Examiner Corporation - ∅ (∅), 16:56, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Geriatric1927banner.jpg

Image:Geriatric1927banner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Argent009 (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, unencyclopedic, promotion of user's own website which may or may not be the official website of Peter Oakley - ∅ (∅), 16:56, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Niger flag.jpg

Image:Niger flag.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Calisurferboy (notify | contribs).
  • Unencyclopedic -- The image in question (a combination of rainbow and swastika) claims to be the flag of Niger, but this seems not to be true. (See [1] and Image:Flag of Niger.svg.) Wikipedia already has an image for the flag of Niger. The use of a swastika, without any other reason for it to be there, seems like a deliberate effort to offend. So I don't see how Wikipedia could ever use this image. (Also orphaned, copyright info is missing.) -- Why Not A Duck 19:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
It looks like it's already been deleted. -- Why Not A Duck 22:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)