User talk:Imacphee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] 300

Howdy and first let me say welcome! I saw your edits to the 300 article and related pages. unfortunately, Wikipedia generally has numbers alone for article about a year (even when many people would probably be looking for something else, see for example, 1 or 666). This way it is at least consistent. As such, I did revert the changes you made, but added a redirect to the 300 (year) page you created. Thanks, --TeaDrinker 18:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GoldenEye

 The plot summary in this article or section is too long or detailed compared to the rest of the article.
Please edit the article to focus on discussing the work rather than merely reiterating the plot.

Hi! See this tag and the linked instructions carefully. Plots must not be overly detailed (Even if they are not long). The word limit is not absolute and does not mean that you remove hard words and replace them with common words just to satisfy it. Use surnames, not first names and images should be at a good distance from each other.

And a requast to make: If you have seen For Your Eyes Only (film), do expand its plot since it is too small. Cheers. Vikrant 07:17, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Black op

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Black op, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 300 edits

While your edit there is nice, I would like to caution you against marking your edits as "minor" when they go beyond the spelling or grammar errors or the placement of punctuation. I am not at all suggesting that you would do the following, but there are contributors who attempt to mask wholesale slaughter of articles under the guise of the minor edit checkbox. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 17:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Again, if you are not making a minor edit, such as correcting spelling or fixing punctuation, do not mark your edits as minor. I shouldn't have to ask you to do this twice. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 18:58, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks bunches. Again, I think your edits have been really concise. :) - Arcayne (cast a spell) 19:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I'm confused

Your user page says that you are "mostly paring down the Plot entries in various films", but you increased the plot length in The Good, the Bad and the Ugly from around 824 words to 1057 words, in this edit. I think we can get the plot length down to 500 words. —Viriditas | Talk 11:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Conceded, though mostly because I felt the previous plot summary was inconsistent, with too much attention paid to some portions of the film while other portions were heavily neglected. I doubt 500 words would be enough to summarize the film, but 700 sounds more realistic. Imacphee (talk) 05:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)