Talk:Imago (album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag
Portal
Imago (album) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music. See also P:AUSMUSIC.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class by WikiProject Albums because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove |auto=yes from the WikiProject Albums banner above.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the |class= parameter in the WikiProject Albums banner above and removing the stub template from the article.

Track lengths would be eppreciated. Amazonis 05:57, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Progressive metal territory

well i thought that was a tad out of leftfield. Imago has almost nothing to do with progressive metal. More likely a venture into mainstream rock territory.. Anyone agree? Mwhale 17:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Oh yeah and there's subjectivity through it, particularly in relation to Clint Boge's vocals (which, mind you, is emotional intensity for 13 year old girls on Imago). Am i allowed to be subjective on the talk page? But anyway, yes. Just some NPOV issues here and there. Mwhale 17:49, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
I'll assume people wouldn't disagree with that so i change it now.... Mwhale 17:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:The Butterfly Effect - Imago.jpg

Image:The Butterfly Effect - Imago.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:The Butterfly Effect - Imago.jpg

Image:The Butterfly Effect - Imago.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)