Talk:Image editing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Graphic design, which collaborates on graphic design-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet been rated on the assessment scale.
Suggested article edit guidelines: To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification. After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
Please rate this article and leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Talk:Image editing

Apparently, nobody thought image editing was worthy of discussion ;-). Root⁴(one)

There is some discussion on the former name of this page Talk:digital image editing. Oicumayberight 02:33, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] clean up

I've added a {{for}} template by way of a more prominent see also to the top of the page, as it's extremely easy to find this page when you might have been looking for Photo editing. I've left a message there arguing for its redirecting to Image manipulation, instead of the other way round, to overcome this confusion.
I see this article is tagged for a clean up, but there's no note nor discussion on the issue. I think the page is ok, just needs shaking up into a more logical order (most common/ better-known editing first, for example) and maybe a bit more inline referencing. It's quite an important page, a good reference for WP:FPC and its criteria and is (another one) on my list of things to do; if there's any comments or ideas, speak up! mikaul^talk 09:41, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] to anyone with an interest in how the practice of photo editing is portrayed

There is a small group of article manipulators who seem to think that photo manipulation better describes photo editing than image editing. I don't have to tell you the negative implications that are associated with the word manipulation. By directing the term "photo editing" to that article, it implies that every form of photo editing is a form of manipulation. So if you don't want to feel guilty for using photoshop, I encourage you to join the debate. Oicumayberight 21:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

On this note, I suggest the addition of a 'controversy" section on this, or another article to discuss the debate between whether or not edited images have the same artistic merit as those which are created by means of a camera and darkroom. --Loser078 (talk) 06:10, 7 March 2008 (UTC)