User talk:Ilja.nieuwland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello welcome to wikipedia. Nice work on Cornelis Dopper but ALWAYS remember to category it at the bottom of the page e.g Category:Dutch composers by placing a [[ ]] around. I see you wikify well. It would be great if you start writing new articles on Dutch composers and painters or something. All the best Ernst Stavro Blofeld 16:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

I have added the birth and death categories and a portrait of him Cornelis Dopper Ernst Stavro Blofeld 16:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! Also, for the category hint, I figured I'd thought of everything but that was obviously not the case. There are still loads of composers to go through, so I guess I'll be back.

Contents

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Doppermahler.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Doppermahler.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:06, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Dopper1915.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dopper1915.jpg. There was a problem with the copyright status of the image. --Eastmain 12:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Dopper1915.jpg

Hi Ilja and thanks for your message.

Unfortunately, this image will be deleted again in a moment.

You need to do two more things. First, we need to see your permission; you need to visit this page and follow the instructions on what to do next.

Second, you appear to have got permission only for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia articles and images are widely syndicated across the world to different sites and in print; images just for Wikipedia use are therefore useless.

If you can get permission to use the image (or an image), you need to get permission to use that image anywhere in any context - in effect, you need to ask the copyright holder to give up all rights and controls on the image. That means the image can be abused; but it can also spread freely with Wikipedia content.

If you can follow those two steps, the image will be protected from deletion and you and Wikipedia will be protected from action under the copyright laws in your locality.

Thanks and happy editing! RΞDVΞRS ✖ ЯΞVΞЯSΞ 12:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Commercial use of Image:Langgaard 04.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Langgaard 04.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Langgaard 04.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Langgaard 04.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:23, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Answer

Bugger it, I'm not going to bother with pix anymore if it's this much trouble (even if it has been stated blatantly obvious that the image can be used by the provider)

[edit] Badings

Interesting about Badings and Pijper- but useful to provide where the information has been obtained if it's not clearly on one of the external links... Thanks! Schissel | Sound the Note! 03:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Johann Rufinatscha headings

Hello, thank you for adding information to Johann Rufinatscha. I've partly reverted your recent edit, the one in which you replaced the format of the headings. This is because the standard format (on English wikipedia, at least) goes ==, then ===, then ====, etc., not the other way around as you did. Jashiin (talk) 13:03, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Xaver Scharwenka

Dear Ilja, I have slightly cropped some words of yours in the X.S. article which had had citation requests on them for a long time. Nothing very drastic and I have kept your sense mainly. If you have some printed refs I'm sure they'd be well appreciated in this article. Best wishes, Eebahgum (talk) 22:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] History of Science WikiProject

Based on your userpage, you might be interested in joining the History of Science WikiProject. You can browse the lastest project newsletter to see what some other editors have been doing lately with the histories of science, medicine and technology. Cheers--ragesoss (talk) 01:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)