User talk:Igni

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I sincerely welcome you to my talk page. Since I prefer to keep conversations in one coherent place, I urge you to place my talk page on watch to see when I respond. If you wish, contact via E-mail is possible, that is, when the matter is not related to Wikipedia.
Archive
Annual Archives


Contents

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hymnus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hymnus.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Weimar Classicism

I´ve made a small transaltion into es: of your article, but I have some cuestion about the see also. Why morphology (biology), which seem to be a scientifical concept rather than a cultural one? And why is it linked to Isaac Newton (I can´t found any reference in Isaac Newton about Weimar Classicism nor in Weimar Classicism about Newton)?--FAR (talk) 09:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

The two are placed in the See Also due to their relevance to Goethe's scientific work (he both created and developed the notion of morphology (now that I have looked, that article, too, could use a lot of work—it doesn't even mention Goethe) and attacked Newton in his inquiry on light with particular emphasis on color), which, as is clear, is relevant to Weimar Classicism. It is indeed in the literature, and while noting the article's incompleteness, I felt it necessary at least to place the two in the See Also so that, until future emendations are made, they will have been discussed at greater length and thus removed from the See Also itself. To clarify a possible misunderstanding I detect from your first question (which I dimly answered in my first sentence here): culture is not separate from science, they are in fact profoundly intertwined. I hope this response answers your questions sufficiently. I am glad to see that the article is, even if only at this time, extending its reach into other languages.— ignis scripta 21:17, 9 April 2008 (UTC)