User talk:Ignat99

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Ternary_logic

IMHO, You have problem with ternary logic. Plz, change back the article. Ignat99 16:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

The article has been cleared by Simões on concrens about unreferenced material. Knorlin says he's re-writing it: Talk:Ternary_logic#Proposed_revamp. If you have knowledge about the topic, you could be a help with the article. (I know your English is shaky, but you say you were involved with Setun.) If it seems to be taking too much time, you'd be welcome to contribute at the Ternary Logic article or talk page. But your line, "It is false - false or true ? :-)" was not understood. --Loqi T. 11:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)


You wrote:

IMHO, You have problem with ternary logic. Plz, change back the article. We maked Setun, we understand it. Ignat99 16:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Aristotlean logic which provides for true and false and \sigma\upsilon\mu\beta\varepsilon\beta\eta\kappa o \zeta.

It is true! Ignat99 14:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm not exactly sure what you mean when you say "we" made Setun. Do you mean your fellow former Soviets (in the same way "we" qua United States and the Soviet Union won World War II)? Royal "we"? The multiple people who are using the User:Ignat99 account? You'll have to clarify that point for me.
In any event, I've read the Organon and have never seen any definitive statements on trivalentism in it. It's sometimes said that Aristotle kicked the idea around in On Interpretation, but what is today called "Aristotelian logic" is his work on syllogisms. If you think otherwise, you'll have to cite the work and section number. For now, I've reverted your edit made to the ternary logic article. Simões (talk/contribs) 19:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I mean the Soviet Union and my schools of thought (Moscow Institute of Electronic Technology) and my teacher ([Nikolai Brusentsov http://www.icfcst.kiev.ua/MUSEUM/Brusentsov.html]) and our (russian) philosophers. Ignat99 06:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Logo miet.png

Hello, Ignat99. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Logo miet.png) was found at the following location: User:Ignat99. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 18:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Invite

 I notice you have expressed an interest in logic. Have you considered joining the Wikipedia:WikiProject Logic? It is an effort to coordinate the work of Wikipedians who are knowledgeable about logic in an effort to improve the general quality and range of Wikipedia articles on logic topics. We at the project invite your participation and correspondence. Be well.

Gregbard 08:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)