Ideology of Iranian Revolution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page.(December 2007) Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved.

See also: Iranian revolution

The ideology of the Iranian Revolution can be summarized as populist, nationalist and most of all Shi'a Islamic.

The Iranian revolution expresses itself in the language of Islam, that is to say, as a religious movement with a religious leadership, a religiously formulated critique of the old order, and religiously expressed plans for the new. Muslim revolutionaries look to the birth of Islam as their model, and see themselves as engaged in a struggle against paganism, oppression, and empire.|Bernard Lewis|^[1]

Perhaps the most important of the diverse ideological interpretation of Islam within the grand alliance that led to the 1979 revolution were traditional clerical quietism, Khomeinism, Ali Shariati’s Islamic-left ideology, and Mehdi Bazargan’s liberal-democratic Islam. Less powerful were the socialist guerrilla groups of Islamic and secular variants, and the secular constitutionalism in socialist and nationalist forms.^[2]

Revolutionaries railed against corruption, extravagance and autocratic nature of Pahlavi rule;^[3] policies that helped the rich at the expense of the poor; and the economic and cultural domination/exploitation of Iran by non-Muslim foreigners -- particularly Americans.^[4] Demonstrators chanted slogans such as "Independence, Freedom, and Islamic Republic,"^[5]

Contributors to the ideology included Jalal Al-e-Ahmad, who formulated the idea of Gharbzadegi -- that Western culture must be rejected and fought as was a plague or an intoxication that alienated Muslims from their roots and identity.^[6] Ali Shariati influenced many young Iranians with his interpretation of Islam as the one true way of awakening the oppressed and liberating the Third World from colonialism and neo-colonialism.^[7]

Contents 1 Khomeini 2 Velayat-e faqih 3 Ideology in practice 4 See also 5 References and notes 5.1 Bibliography

[edit] Khomeini

The author who ultimately formulated the ideology of the revolution though, was the man who dominated the revolution itself -- the Ayatollah Khomeini. He preached that revolt, and especially martyrdom, against injustice and tyranny was part of Shia Islam,^[8] that clerics should mobilize and lead their flocks into action, not just to advise them. He introduced Qur'anic terms -- mustazafin ('weak')^[9] and mustakbirin ('proud and mighty')^[10] -- for the Marxist vocabulary of "oppressed" and "oppressors."^[11] He rejected the influence of both Soviet and American superpowers in Iran with the slogan "not Eastern, nor Western - Islamic Republican" (Persian: نه شرقی نه غربی جمهوری اسلامی)

[edit] Velayat-e faqih

But even more importantly he developed the ideology of who would run the Islamic Republic, what form of government it would take. Khomeini believed strongly that Islam required the principle of velayat-e faqih, be applied to government, i.e. that Muslims, in fact everyone, required "guardianship," in the form of rule or supervision by the leading Islamic jurist or jurists -- such as Khomeini himself.^[12]

Main article: Hokumat-e Islami : Velayat-e faqih (book by Khomeini)

This was necessary because Islam requires obedience to traditional Islamic sharia law alone. Following this law was not only the Islamically correct thing to do, it would prevent poverty, injustice, and the "plundering" of Muslim land by foreign unbelievers. But for all this to happen, sharia had to be protected from innovation and deviation, and this required putting Islamic jurists in control of government.^[13]

Establishing and obeying this Islamic government was so important it was "actually an expression of obedience to God," ultimately "more necessary even than prayer and fasting" for Islam because without it true Islam will not survive. ^[14] It was a universal principle, not one confined to Iran. All the world needed and deserved just government, i.e. true Islamic government, and Khomeini "regarded the export of the Islamic revolution as imperative." ^[15] However regarding "export of revolution" he stated: it "does not mean interfering in other nation's affairs",^[16] but "answering their questions about knowing God" ^[17][18]

This revolutionary vision of theocratic government was in stark contrast to the quietist Shiism that called for withdrawal from political life, or at least government, until the return of the Mahdi. And needless to say it was in conflict with the hopes and plans of Iran's democratic secularists and Islamic leftists. At the same time Khomeini knew a broad revolutionary base was necessary and did not hesitate to encourage these forces to unite with his supporters to overthrow the Shah.^[19] Consequently, the ideology of the revolution was known for its "imprecision"^[20] or "vague character"^[21] prior to its victory, with the specific character of velayat-e faqih/theocratic waiting to be made public when the time was right.^[22] Khomeini believed the opposition to velayat-e faqih/theocratic government by the other revolutionaries was the result of propaganda campaign by foreign imperialists eager to prevent Islam from putting a stop to their plundering. This propaganda was so insidious it had penetrated even Islamic seminaries and made it necessary to "observe the principles of taqiyya" (i.e. dissimulation of the truth in defense of Islam), when talking about (or not talking about) Islamic government. ^[23][24]

This split between the general and the specific elements of the revolution's ideology inevitably broke down the unity of the revolution as Khomeini abandoned taqiyya^[25][26] and worked determinedly to establish a government led by Islamic clerics, while opponents of theocracy resisted. (see below: Khomeini takes power, Consolidation of power by Khomeini and Opposition to the revolution) In the end the break was not fatal. The opposition was defeated and the revolutionary ideology prevailed.

[edit] Ideology in practice

Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. (March 2008)

Following the victory of the revolution, its ideology was apparent in social, econmoic and cultural policies.

In terms of dress, western-style neckties for men and uncovered hair, arms, etc. for women were banned. But there were non-religious changes as well, such as an emphasis on proletarian dress, manners, customs, as opposed to Western aristocratic or Bourgeoisie elegance and extravagence of the Shah's era. For example, observors noted in the early days of the revolution the "canteen-like" nature of restaurant meals, meant "to underscore the triumph of the Muslim proletariat." In men's dress, a judge described the "overnight transformation" in February 1979 of the Ministry of Justice in Tehran:

The men were no longer wearing suits and ties but plain slacks and collarless shirts, many of them quite wrinkled, some even stained. Even my nose caught a whiff of the change. The slight scent of cologne or perfume that had lingered in the corridors, especially in the mornings, was absent.^[27]

[edit] See also

• Iranian revolution
• Hokumat-e Islami : Velayat-e faqih (book by Khomeini)
• Ruhollah Khomeini
• Ali Shariati
• Jalal Al-e-Ahmad
• History
• History of the Islamic Republic of Iran

[edit] References and notes

[edit] Bibliography

• Amuzgar, Jahangir (1991). The Dynamics of the Iranian Revolution: The Pahlavis' Triumph and Tragedy: 31.. SUNY Press. 
• Arjomand, Said Amir (1988). Turban for the Crown: The Islamic Revolution in Iran. Oxford University Press. 
• Abrahamian, Ervand (1982). Iran between two revolutions. Princeton University Press. 
• Benard, Cheryl and Khalilzad, Zalmay (1984). "The Government of God" — Iran's Islamic Republic. Columbia University Press. 
• Graham, Robert (1980). Iran, the Illusion of Power. St. Martin's Press. 
• Harney, Desmond (1998). The priest and the king: an eyewitness account of the Iranian revolution. I.B. Tauris. 
• Harris, David (2004). The Crisis: the President, the Prophet, and the Shah — 1979 and the Coming of Militant Islam. Little, Brown. 
• Hoveyda, Fereydoun (2003). The Shah and the Ayatollah: Iranian mythology and Islamic revolution. Praeger. 
• Kapuscinski, Ryszard (1985). Shah of Shahs. Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich. 
• Keddie, Nikki (2003). Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution. Yale University Press. 
• Kepel, Gilles (2002). The Trail of Political Islam. Harvard University Press. 
• Mackey, Sandra (1996). The Iranians: Persia, Islam and the Soul of a Nation. Dutton. 
• Miller, Judith (1996). God Has Ninety Nine Names. Simon & Schuster. 
• Moin, Baqer (2000). Khomeini: Life of the Ayatollah. Thomas Dunne Books. 
• Roy, Olivier (1994). The Failure of Political Islam. Harvard University Press. 
• Ruthven, Malise (2000). Islam in the World. Oxford University Press. 
• Schirazi, Asghar (1997). The Constitution of Iran. Tauris. 
• Shirley, Edward (1997). Know Thine Enemy. Farra. 
• Taheri, Amir (1985). The Spirit of Allah. Adler & Adler. 
• Wright, Robin (2000). The Last Great Revolution: Turmoil And Transformation In Iran. Alfred A. Knopf: Distributed by Random House. 
• Zabih, Sepehr (1982). Iran Since the Revolution. Johns Hopkins Press. 
• Zanganeh, Lila Azam (editor) (2006). My Sister, Guard Your Veil, My Brother, Guard Your Eyes : Uncensored Iranian Voices. Beacon Press.