User talk:ICSGlobal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
TN‑X-Man 18:00, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] I respectfully disagree
I ask you to look at least a dozen different references to ICS in other Wikipedia articles. The field of project scheduling has grown to become an international specialty. The Project Management Institute has nearly 1,000,000 members, and at the center of project management is [[project scheduling]. The International Center for Scheduling is the only organization dedicated exclusively to this important field.
Elsewhere Wikipedia editors are complaining that articles on topics such as project scheduling, project planning, schedule, project management, and others lack substance. I am spending my time trying to add substance to these articles.
I have been in project scheduling for 32 years and have the #2 best-selling book on project planning and scheduling, and am happy to help Wikipedia develop its treatment of this important subject. Meanwhile, my company, International Center for Scheduling, is being banned from Wikipedia as not having notoriety.
[edit] Speedy deletion of International center for scheduling
A tag has been placed on International center for scheduling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TN‑X-Man 17:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Scheduling practice
I have reinserted the maintenance tags on this article, Please see the above welcome post for guidance regarding editing and adding articles at Wikipedia. Thank you. --Richhoncho (talk) 20:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of Murray B. Woolf
A tag has been placed on Murray B. Woolf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bearian (talk) 21:12, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Project planning, you will be blocked from editing. Please do not deviate wikipedia articles so that they're more aligned with your business. Pm master 14:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Murray, I echo Pm master's concerns. Please, please cease adding promotional material to your own sites and products to the various project related articles in Wikipedia. You are absolutely free to improve any article you see fit, but please stick to material cited to third party sources. You can read our policy on conflicts of interests for more guidance. Thanks. Kuru talk 01:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- This is often not a reflection on the user, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines and are invited to contribute to Wikipedia under an appropriate username. If you feel this block was made in error, you may quickly and easily appeal it - see below.
Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, related to a 'real-world' group or organization, confusing, or misleading.
If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username which is quick and easy. To do so, please follow these directions:
-
- Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page.
- At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
- Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use. The account is created upon acceptance – do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change since we can far easier allocate your new name to you, if it is not yet used. Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username.
Kuru talk 22:06, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of Scheduling practice
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Scheduling practice, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
