User talk:IanMSpencer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Spenny is taking a long wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia when? Not sure, if at all, too many people with intransigent views. It's not for me, I need to get a life! |
Contents |
[edit] Request for mediation
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:No original research, and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation.
- For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 07:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
I just wanted to leave a message to say thank you, most earnestly, for your recent thoughtful comments on WT:NOR about source issues. They are insightful, coherent and well-expressed. That's exactly the kind of feedback I most desired. Thank you!!! Vassyana 12:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The difference (an observation)
The difference between Usenet and Wikipedia is that Wikipedia has consensus. Otherwise the experience is quite similar. Requiring consensus creates a slight pressure toward resolution. Such pressure is totally lacking in Usenet. I've been there.
OH. I should also say: that pressure is of extreme value. --Minasbeede 22:27, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Request for Mediation
 |
A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:No original research. |
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
[edit] Thanks
Full message at my talk. --Minasbeede 16:49, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] No problem
It's very difficult to maintain a civil atmosphere in the face of constant 'integrity accusations' and other such garbage, when they fail to state a point, just keep throwing out more accusations. I even made the attempt, however foolishly, to apologize personally on Filll's apge, but though I know he has read it by now, no answer and the accusations still appear. Oh well, to bad Admins don't have to go through a renewal vote. wbfergus Talk 19:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
For reverting vandalism to my user page. --John 16:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] If it wasn't for people like you
Wikipedia would be crap!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neights (talk • contribs) 08:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] NOR Request for arbitration
Because of your participation in discussions relating to the "PSTS" model in the No original research article, I am notifying you that a request for arbitration has been opened here. I invite you to provide a statement encouraging the Arbcom to review this matter, so that we can settle it once and for all. COGDEN 00:02, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
