Talk:Ian Craig

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Featured article star Ian Craig is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do.
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on September 1, 2006.
cricket ball Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability
Ian Craig is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.
Featured article FA This article has been rated as FA-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Featured article FA This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.
Photo request It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.

Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.
Flag
Portal
Ian Craig is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Featured article FA This article has been rated as FA-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports.

[edit] GA passed

  1. It is well written.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
  4. It is neutral.
  5. It is stable.
  6. It is illustrated, where possible and appropriate, by images

I do wonder what national service he did in 1954-55 that made him miss the season... but a good article nevertheless and well cited. --DarkFalls talk 05:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)